[Python-Dev] AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages (original) (raw)
Jon Riehl jon.riehl at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 19:14:21 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Nick, all,
Just for the record, I would point to Mython (mython.org) as an existing provider of this capability. I've already added an AST node called "Quote" that functions like your DSL node, along with well defined lexical, concrete syntax, and compile-time properties.
I have a mostly functioning front end for 2.X that does these expansions (MyFront), and I'm waiting for a stable Mercurial migration (I've been only lightly lurking on python-dev, so if this already exists, someone should ping me) so I can publish a 3.X branch that will get rid of a lot of the code I have to maintain by just building on top of CPython (CMython? smirk).
It looks like you have some ideas about import semantics and managing compile-time dependencies. I would invite further elaboration on the mython-dev Google group. I currently have two different mechanisms implemented, one via import hooks and the other by forced global recompilation, but neither of these satisfies because you are imposing a compile-time concept into a thoroughly dynamic language.
...and yes, compile-time metaprogramming is insane.
Regards, -Jon
http://mython.org/ - Make Python yours.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
A few odds and ends from recent discussions finally clicked into something potentially interesting earlier this evening. Or possibly just something insane. I'm not quite decided on that point as yet (but leaning towards the latter).
Anyway, without further ado, I present: AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages ====================================================== Consider: # In some other module ast.registerdsl("dsl.sql", dsl.sql.TransformAST) # In a module using that DSL import dsl.sql def lookupaddress(name : dsl.sql.char, dob : dsl.sql.date) from dsl.sql: select address from people where name = {name} and dob = {dob}
Suppose that the standard AST for the latter looked something like: DSL(syntax="dsl.sql", name='lookupaddress', args=arguments( args=[arg(arg='name', annotation=<Normal AST for "dsl.sql.char">), arg(arg='dob', annotation=<Normal AST for "dsl.sql.date">)], vararg=None, varargannotation=None, kwonlyargs=[], kwarg=None, kwargannotation=None, defaults=[], kwdefaults=[]), body=[Expr(value=Str(s='select address\nfrom people\nwhere name = {name} and dob = {dob}'))], decoratorlist=[], returns=None) (For those not familiar with the AST, the above is actually just the existing Function node with a "syntax" attribute added) At compile time (note, not function definition time), the registered AST transformation hook would be invoked and would replace that DSL node with "standard" AST nodes. For example, depending on the design of the DSL and its support code, the above example might be equivalent to: @dsl.sql.escapeandvalidateargs def lookupaddress(name: dsl.sql.char, dob: dsl.sql.date): args = dict(name=name, dob=dob) query = "select address\nfrom people\nwhere name = {name} and dob = {dob}" return dsl.sql.cursor(query, args) As a simpler example, consider something like: def f() from allnonlocal: x += 1 y -= 2 That was translated at compile time into: def f(): nonlocal x, y x += 1 y -= 2 My first pass at a rough protocol for the AST transformers suggests they would only need two methods: getcookie() - Magic cookie to add to PYC files containing instances of the DSL (allows recompilation to be forced if the DSL is updated) transformAST(node) - a DSL() node is passed in, expected to return an AST containing no DSL nodes (SyntaxError if one is found) Attempts to use an unregistered DSL would trigger SyntaxError So there you are, that's the crazy idea. The stoning of the heretic may now commence :) Where this idea came from was the various discussions about "make statement" style constructs and a conversation I had with Eric Snow at Pycon about function definition time really being too late to do anything particularly interesting that couldn't already be handled better in other ways. Some tricks Dave Malcolm had done to support Python level manipulation of the AST during compilation also played a big part, as did Eugene Toder's efforts to add an AST optimisation step to the compilation process. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jon.riehl%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] AST Transformation Hooks for Domain Specific Languages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]