[Python-Dev] peps: Update PEP 399 to include comments from python-dev. (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Apr 13 00:31:36 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 396, Module Version Numbers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] peps: Update PEP 399 to include comments from python-dev.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:59:53 +0200 brett.cannon <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
Technical details of +the VM providing the accelerated code are allowed to differ as +necessary, e.g., a class being a
type
when implemented in C.
I don't understand what this means ("a class being a type
when
implemented in C").
+If this test were to provide 100% branch coverage for +
heapq.heappop()
in the pure Python implementation then the +accelerated C code would be allowed to be added to CPython's standard +library. If it did not, then the test suite would need to be updated +until 100% branch coverage was provided before the accelerated C code +could be added.
I really think that's a too strong requirement. We don't want to paralyze development until the stdlib gets 100% coverage in the tests suite.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 396, Module Version Numbers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] peps: Update PEP 399 to include comments from python-dev.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]