[Python-Dev] PEP 399: Pure Python/C Accelerator Module Compatibiilty Requirements (original) (raw)
Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 14:22:12 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 399: Pure Python/C Accelerator Module Compatibiilty Requirements
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 399: Pure Python/C Accelerator Module Compatibiilty Requirements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefanml at behnel.de> wrote:
I think this social problem of the PEP can only be solved if the CPython project stops doing the major share of the stdlib maintenance, thus freeing its own developer capacities to focus on CPython related improvements and optimisations, just like the other implementations currently do. I'm not sure we want that at this point.
We've made a start on that aspect by granting CPython access to several of the core developers on the other VMs. The idea being that they can update the pure Python versions of modules directly rather than having to wait for one of us to do it on their behalf. Of course, as Maciej pointed out, that is currently hindered by the fact that the other VMs aren't targeting 3.3 yet, and that's where the main CPython development is happening. We're also slightly hindered by the fact that not all of us got privilages so far (Antonio Cuni in particular).
Yeah, I emailed him this morning, I dropped the ball on his commit bit post pycon due to email overload. I'm resolving it today.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 399: Pure Python/C Accelerator Module Compatibiilty Requirements
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 399: Pure Python/C Accelerator Module Compatibiilty Requirements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]