[Python-Dev] GIL removal question (original) (raw)

Rene Nejsum rene at stranden.com
Fri Aug 12 18:57:10 CEST 2011

My two danish kroner on GIL issues….

I think I understand the background and need for GIL. Without it Python programs would have been cluttered with lock/synchronized statements and C-extensions would be harder to write. Thanks to Sturla Molden for he's explanation earlier in this thread.

However, the GIL is also from a time, where single threaded programs running in single core CPU's was the common case.

On a new MacBook Pro I have 8 core's and would expect my multithreaded Python program to run significantly fast than on a one-core CPU.

Instead the program slows down to a much worse performance than on a one-core CPU. (Have a look at David Beazley's excellent talk on PyCon 2010 and he's paper http://www.dabeaz.com/GIL/ and http://blip.tv/carlfk/mindblowing-python-gil-2243379)

For my viewpoint the multicore performance problems is the primary problem with the GIL, event though the other issues pointed out are valid.

I still believe that the solution for Python would be to have an "every object is a thread/coroutine" solution a'la

at least looked into as a alternative to a STM solution.

But, my head is not big enough to fully understand this :-)

kind regards /rene

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110812/b7fce3aa/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list