[Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex? (original) (raw)
MRAB python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sat Aug 27 01:21:03 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 27/08/2011 00:08, Tom Christiansen wrote:
"M.-A. Lemburg"<mal at egenix.com> wrote on Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:00:31 +0200:
The good part is that it's based on the re code, the FUD comes from the fact that the new lib is 380kB larger than the old one and that's not even counting the generated 500kB of lookup tables. Well, you have to put the property tables somewhere, somehow. There are various schemes for demand loading them as needed, but I don't know whether those are used. FYI, the .pyd for Python v3.2 is 227KB, about half of which is property tables.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we move to replace re with regex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]