[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3? (original) (raw)
Łukasz Langa lukasz at langa.pl
Thu Dec 8 08:54:18 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wiadomość napisana przez Chris McDonough w dniu 8 gru 2011, o godz. 06:08:
It would make it possible to share code like this across py2 and py3:
a = u'foo'
As Armin himself wrote, py3k-compatible code ported from 2.x is often very ugly. This kind of change would only deepen the problem.
-1
Or:
from future import unicodeliterals a = 'foo' I recognize that the last option is probably the way "its meant to be done"
Yes, that's the reason 2.x has b''. If Python 2.8 ever came to be, making this future work with the standard library would be the right way to do it.
-- Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Łukasz Langa Senior Systems Architecture Engineer
IT Infrastructure Department Grupa Allegro Sp. z o.o.
Pomyśl o środowisku naturalnym zanim wydrukujesz tę wiadomość! Please consider the environment before printing out this e-mail.
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111208/8dc668db/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1898 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111208/8dc668db/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]