[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3? (original) (raw)
Vinay Sajip vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Dec 10 00:12:09 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Glyph <glyph twistedmatrix.com> writes:
The biggest issue for the single-codebase approach is 'except ... as ...'. Peppering one's codebase with calls to sys.excinfo() can be a real performance problem, especially on PyPy. Not to mention how ugly it is. For some reason I thought that this syntax was only supported by 2.7 and up; I see now that it's 2.6 and up.
Granted that it's ugly, but where is the evidence that it can be a real performance problem? I mean in practice on real projects, rather than in theory or on code contrived to show up a problem.
Please note, I'm not saying it isn't a real performance problem, I'm just asking where the evidence is, whether running on PyPy or elsewhere.
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]