[Python-Dev] r88178 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/crashers/underlying_dict.py (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Tue Jan 25 19:21:32 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] r88178 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/crashers/underlying_dict.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] r88178 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/crashers/underlying_dict.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le mardi 25 janvier 2011 à 20:11 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:00:28 +0100 (CET) > benjamin.peterson <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: >> Author: benjamin.peterson >> Date: Tue Jan 25 01:00:28 2011 >> New Revision: 88178 >> >> Log: >> another pretty crasher served up by pypy > > Some comments would be nice. Right now it looks pretty close to > deliberately obfuscated code (especially with the call to > gc.getreferrers()). > > Regards > > Antoine. >
I gets to a dict of class circumventing dictproxy. It's yet unclear why it segfaults.
Perhaps the method cache? But why the comment "# should print 1"? Shouldn't it print 2 instead?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] r88178 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/crashers/underlying_dict.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] r88178 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/crashers/underlying_dict.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]