[Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sun Jul 3 20:33:01 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Extending documentation innacuracies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3 July 2011 19:20, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Paul Moore <p.f.moore gmail.com> writes:
OK, having looked through this, it looks pretty solid to me. I might try installing Vinay's implementation and seeing how it feels in use, as well... Do have a play, it would be nice to get feedback. It's only available as source, though - is that OK?
No problem - I can build it from source.
I'd be inclined not to worry too much about per-user installations. Are per-user file associations possible? I've never used them, myself. Yes, and they can be problematic: see http://www.deadlybloodyserious.com/2007/05/no-script-arguments/ where the problem described has also bitten me. I've no idea what put that association in the registry.
Ugh. That's nasty. It doesn't even look like a standard file type association.
Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Extending documentation innacuracies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]