[Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation (original) (raw)
Mark Hammond skippy.hammond at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 08:59:42 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/07/2011 5:16 PM, I wrote:
Given [the C implementation] is now ahead of the Python reference impl, I wonder if we should just drop all wording about that reference impl and just treat the C impl as canonical?
I'm looking to update the PEP based on this discussion - does anyone object to the above? Or to put it another way, does anyone believe dropping the Python reference implementation is to the detriment of the PEP?
Thanks,
Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]