[Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Jul 30 01:27:05 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:02:32 -0400 Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
On 7/29/2011 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:51:18 -0400 > Barry Warsaw<barry at python.org> wrote: >> On Jul 29, 2011, at 05:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >>>> test.support is part of the stdlib. >>> >>> We have lots of internal APIs which are not documented, though. >>> And test.support is for internal use. >> >> The solution then is to rename test.support to test.support to make it clear >> it's an internal implementation detail. Then you can remove the entire >> section from the stdlib docs and just document it in the code. > > Ideally so.
The effect of this will be to discourage new people (including myself in the category) from writing or reviewing patches.
I'm sorry, can you be more precise. The effect of what? And why would that be so?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]