[Python-Dev] Commit changelog: issue number and merges (original) (raw)
Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Tue May 10 04:51:19 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Commit changelog: issue number and merges
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Commit changelog: issue number and merges
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
R. David Murray writes:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
I'm sorry, but I've looked at the output of that and the mental overhead has so far proven too high for it to be of any use to me.
How about the hgk extension, and "hg view"?
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/HgkExtension
But as I think about this, frankly I'd rather see atomic commits, even on merges. That was something I disliked about svnmerge, the fact that often an svnmerge commit involved many changesets from the other branch. That was especially painful in exactly the same situation: trying to backtrack a change starting from 'svn blame'.
I don't understand the issue. In my experience, hg annotate will point to the commit on the branch, not to the merge, unless there was a conflict, in which case the merge is the "right" place (although not necessarily the most useful place) to point.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Commit changelog: issue number and merges
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Commit changelog: issue number and merges
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]