[Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions for Python 3.3 (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Oct 15 10:04:05 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions for Python 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions for Python 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
I wish I felt more comfortable with MSI as a format (as opposed to an opaque clickable installer). I'd be interested to know what others think.
Compilation can be a problem on Linux systems as well, so a platform neutral format is a better idea. Just have a mechanism that allows pysetup to create a bdist_msi from a bdist_simple. Similar, bdist_rpm and bdist_deb plugins could be taught to interpret bdist_simple.
However, you do get into architecture problems (x86 vs x86_64 vs ARM) if you go that route.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions for Python 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions for Python 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]