[Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot? (original) (raw)
Stefan Krah stefan at bytereef.org
Thu Sep 15 20:27:22 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 393: Porting Guidelines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
I am seeing a few commits related to clang (a C compiler, alternative to GCC), but we ¿only? have a buildbot using clang as the compiler.
If there is interest, I would deploy 32 and 64 bits buildbots under my current OpenIndiana buildbot.
I think it makes sense. clang has different warnings and the versions
= 2.9 apparently optimize extremely aggressively. Probably it would be most useful to run these bots with -O2 (and not --with-pydebug).
Stefan Krah
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 393: Porting Guidelines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]