[Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 02:40:17 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
Python has worked pretty well without high res and monotonic clocks for 20 years. Let's not rush into a suboptimal design based on who can outlast everyone else in this discussion.
+1
FWIW, I'd be fine with underscore prefixes on any additions to the relevant module APIs for 3.3.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]