[Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed (original) (raw)
Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Fri Apr 6 22:36:28 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:32, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
I prefer to use CLOCKMONOTONIC, not because it is also available for older Linux kernels, but because it is more reliable. Even if the underlying clock source is unstable (unstable frequency), a delta of two reads of the CLOCKMONOTONIC clock is a result in seconds, whereas CLOCKMONOTONICRAW may use an unit a little bit bigger or smaller than a second.
Aha. OK, CLOCK_MONOTONIC it is then.
//Lennart
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 418 is too divisive and confusing and should be postponed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]