[Python-Dev] [compatibility-sig] do all VMs implement the ast module? (was: Re: AST optimizer implemented in Python) (original) (raw)
fwierzbicki at gmail.com fwierzbicki at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 00:35:35 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [compatibility-sig] do all VMs implement the ast module? (was: Re: AST optimizer implemented in Python)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [compatibility-sig] do all VMs implement the ast module? (was: Re: AST optimizer implemented in Python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
Direct. There is an AST grammar file that gets compiled into C and Python objects which are used by the compiler (c version) or exposed to users (Python version). At the risk of making you repeat yourself, and just to be sure I understand: There are C objects used by the compiler and Python objects that are exposed to the users (written in C though) that are generated by the AST grammar. That at least sounds like they are different. The last I checked the grammar was Python.asdl and the translater was asdl_c.py resulting in /Python/Python-ast.c which looks like it is the implementation of _ast.py
Are the AST objects from Python-ast.c used by the compiler? And what is the relationship between Python-ast.c and /Python/ast.c? And what about the CST mentioned at the top of /Python/ast.c?
I ask all of this because I want to be sure that separating the internal AST in Jython from the one exposed in ast.py is really a good idea. If CPython does not make this distinction that will be a strike against the idea.
-Frank
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [compatibility-sig] do all VMs implement the ast module? (was: Re: AST optimizer implemented in Python)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [compatibility-sig] do all VMs implement the ast module? (was: Re: AST optimizer implemented in Python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]