[Python-Dev] Writable doc (original) (raw)
Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Thu Jan 19 19:40:09 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Writable __doc__
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Writable __doc__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 19/01/2012 17:46, Ethan Furman wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote: > We should not encourage people to write code that works with a certain > bugfix release but not with the previous bugfix release of the same > feature release.
Then what's the point of a bug-fix release? If 3.2.1 had broken threading, wouldn't we fix it in 3.2.2 and encourage folks to switch to 3.2.2? Or would we scrap 3.2 and move immediately to 3.3? (Is that more or less what happened with 3.0?)
Like it or not, this has worked this way ever since new-style classes were introduced. That has made it a de-facto feature. But what of the discrepancy between the 'type' metaclass and any other Python metaclass?
There are many discrepancies between built-in types and any Python class. Writable attributes are (generally) one of them.
Michael
Given that we haven't had any complaints about this in nearly a decade, the backport can't be important. Don't do it. Agreed.
Ethan
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
-- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Writable __doc__
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Writable __doc__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]