[Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition (original) (raw)
Alexandre Zani alexandre.zani at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 22:17:24 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-1 implemented
It appears to target the problem of platform-dependent parameters. However as was discussed previously, much more common than a parameter simply not being supported on a platform is a parameter supporting different values on different platforms. As such, I think that it solves too small a sub-set of the problem that it attacks to be useful. Raising exceptions solves the problem.
Furthermore, whether a parameter is implemented or not is not properly a part of the callable's signature. It's a part of the function's internals.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
On 06/15/2012 12:50 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
Open questions: 1. Should we keep 'Parameter.implemented' or not. Please vote
+1 to keeping Parameter.implemented. Let's get this over with, /arry
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexandre.zani%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 362: 4th edition
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]