[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives (original) (raw)
Eli Bendersky eliben at gmail.com
Wed Mar 14 05:03:10 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] getting patches committed (was Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rather than indicating apathy on the party of third party developers, this might be a sign that core Python is unapproachable or not worth the effort.
For instance I have several one line patches languishing, I can't imagine how disappointing it would be to have significantly larger patches ignored, but it happens.
A one-line patch for a complex module or piece of code may require much more than looking at that single line to really review. I hope you understand that.
That said, if you find any issues in the bug tracker that in your opinion need only a few minutes of attention from a core developer, feel free to send a note to the mentorship mailing list. People sometimes come there asking for precisely this thing (help reviewing a simple patch they submitted), and usually get help quickly if their request is justified.
Eli
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] getting patches committed (was Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]