[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3 (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Wed May 9 18:21:12 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 09, 2012, at 05:20 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Ah, good point. In that case, consider me convinced: static method it is. It can join mro() as the second non-underscore method defined on type().
+1
If I may dip into the bikeshed paint once more. I think it would be useful to
establish a naming convention for alternative constructors implemented as
{static,class}methods. I don't like build_class() much. Would you be
opposed to type.new()?
-Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]