[Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Thu May 31 18:56:28 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2012/5/31 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org> wrote:
Eric Snow wrote:
The implementation for sys.implementation is going to use a new (but "private") type[1]. It's basically equivalent to the following: Does this really need to be written in C rather than Python? Yes, because we want to use it in the sys module. As you get lower down in the interpreter stack, implementing things in Python actually starts getting painful because of bootstrapping issues (e.g. that's why both structseq and collections.namedtuple exist).
sys.implementation could be added by site or some other startup file.
-- Regards, Benjamin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a new type for sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]