[Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.3.0 release candidate 3 (original) (raw)
Tim Delaney timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com
Fri Sep 28 23:52:51 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.3.0 release candidate 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.3.0 release candidate 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 29 September 2012 07:50, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's seriously impressive. If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of: "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations within the range of numbers covered by float" or is there not enough evidence to conclude that? Substitute suitable factor for 3x. Obviously
And I meant to say congratulations - that's a really impressive result.
Oh-oh. The PSU (which does not exist) has found me. I must hi
Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120929/79233f1c/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.3.0 release candidate 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [RELEASED] Python 3.3.0 release candidate 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]