[Python-Dev] The end of 2.7 (original) (raw)

Gregory P. Smith greg at krypto.org
Sun Apr 7 00:21:10 CEST 2013

I agree with Benjamin though is it really necessary to do two 2.7 releases a year for the last two years? that's rather rapid (but as the release manager its your call).

A few of us (sorry I forgot who all was there though I think Martin was?) had a discussion at PyCon a few weeks ago and seemed to think that a state of affairs where a 2.7.5 release one year-ish from now would be fine as the last binary release but that continuing to make a 2.7.6 and beyond as source only releases was reasonable.

Regardless, the 5 years of 2.7 supported releases plan still makes sense regardless of release binaries being available for windows and mac or not.

-gps

On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Christian Heimes <christian at python.org>wrote:

Am 06.04.2013 23:11, schrieb Georg Brandl: > Am 06.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: >> Per my last message, 2.7.4 has at long last been released. I apologize >> for the long interval between 2.7.3 and 2.7.4. To create more >> determinism in the future, I will be soon updating PEP 373 with >> approximate dates of future 2.7 bugfix releases. I will be aiming for >> 6 month intervals. >> >> This means we need to talk about how many more 2.7 releases there are >> going to be. At the release of 2.7.0, I thought we promised 5 years of >> bugfix maintenance, but my memory may be fuddled. At any rate, 2.7.0 >> was released in July 2010, which currently puts us within a few months >> of 3 years of maintenance. Over the past year, I've been happy to see >> a lot of movement towards 3 including the porting of important >> codebases like Twisted and Django. However, there's also no doubt that >> 2.x is still widely used. Obviously, there will be people who would be >> happy if we kept maintaining 2.7 until 2025, but I think at this >> juncture 5 total years of maintenance is reasonable. This means there >> will be approximately 4 more 2.7 releases. >> >> Thoughts? > > I agree that keeping to 5 years of official maintenance releases is > reasonable at present. > > However, in 2015 I can well imagine offers from group(s) in the community > to maintain the 2.7 branch with fixes ported from 3.x. At that point, > we will have to decide how to treat releases from this "backports" branch.

Five years official releases sounds fine to me, too. Martin, how long are you going to build official Windows binaries for Python 2.7? Christian

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/greg%40krypto.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130406/401b37a3/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list