[Python-Dev] HAVE_FSTAT? (original) (raw)
Charles-François Natali cf.natali at gmail.com
Sun May 19 10:08:39 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_FSTAT?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_FSTAT?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2013/5/17 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
Hello, Some pieces of code are still guarded by: #ifdef HAVEFSTAT ... #endif I would expect all systems to have fstat() these days. It's pretty basic POSIX, and even Windows has had it for ages. Shouldn't we simply make those code blocks unconditional? It would avoid having to maintain unused fallback paths.
I was sure I'd seen a post/bug report about this: http://bugs.python.org/issue12082
The OP was trying to build Python on an embedded platform without fstat().
cf
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_FSTAT?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] HAVE_FSTAT?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]