[Python-Dev] Ordering keyword dicts (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon May 20 00:42:05 CEST 2013

On 20 May 2013 00:57, "Guido van Rossum" <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote:

Hm. Wouldn'tvevery call site be slowed down by checking for that flag?

Yeah, I forgot about having to push everything through the tp_call slot, so we can't easily limit the ordering check to just those cases where the callable accepts arbitrary kwargs.

Cheers, Nick.

— Sent from Mailbox

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > The main use case seems to be the OrderedDict constructor itself. > Otherwise, I can't think of any situation where I would've wanted it. I've had a couple related to populating other mappings where order matters, at least from a predictability and readability perspective, even if it's not strictly required from a standards compliance point of view (think writing XML attributes, etc). I quite liked the idea of a simple flag attribute on function objects that the interpreter checked, with a decorator in functools (or even the builtins) to set it. It's not a particularly elegant solution, but it would get the job done with minimal performance impact on existing functions. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130520/95880020/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list