[Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions (original) (raw)
Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Thu May 23 22:19:20 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/23/2013 01:10 PM, Ćukasz Langa wrote:
On 23 maj 2013, at 20:59, PJ Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
As to the ability to do multiple types registration, you could support it only in type annotations, e.g.:
@func.register def doit(foo: [int, float]): ... Initially I thought so, too. But it seems other people might think this means "a sequence with the first element being an integer, and the second a float". The BDFL seems to have yet a different idea: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2012-December/018129.html This is clearly material for a separate PEP, wink wink, nudge nudge. To the point though. Based on this, and the fact PEP 8 currently disallows annotations within the standard library, I came to the conclusion that currently we should not include the annotation-driven form. I generally lean towards returning the undecorated function, so that if you say: @func.register def doint(foo: int): ... Me too. The PEP has been updated to specify that explicitly.
So with this decision made, are there any open issues left? Or can we invite Guido back to the discussion? ;)
--
Ethan
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 443 - Single-dispatch generic functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]