[Python-ideas] Non-boolean return from contains (original) (raw)
Robert Kern robert.kern at gmail.com
Tue Jul 27 18:25:11 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Non-boolean return from __contains__
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Non-boolean return from __contains__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/27/10 9:02 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Therefore I think the LINQ approach, which (IIUC) converts an expression into a parse tree when certain syntax is encountered, and calls a built-in method with that parse tree, would be a fresh breath of air. No need deriding it just because Microsoft came up with it first.
I've occasionally wished that we could repurpose backticks for expression literals:
expr = x + y*z
assert isinstance(expr, ast.Expression)
And triple backticks for blocks of statements:
block = ``` try: frobnicate() except FrobError: print("Not on my watch!")
``` assert isinstance(block, ast.Module)
Too bad backticks look like grit on Tim's monitor!
-- Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Non-boolean return from __contains__
- Next message: [Python-ideas] Non-boolean return from __contains__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]