[Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Dec 24 00:28:23 CET 2004
- Previous message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Next message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl> writes:
Second question: I think the solution to peaceful coexistence is that all Pythons adopt the solution sketched in Bob's mail <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/2004-December/_ _012292.html>. That discussion is rather technical, but what it boils down to is that all Pythons (on 10.3) build their extensions with "-undefined dynamiclookup", thereby forestalling that extensions inadvertently pull in a second, different, Python framework.
Side question: do we know yet if the Python shipped with tiger will get this right? I think this is checkable by people not under NDA, but if not at least those people who have seen Tiger previews can think about it :)
Cheers, mwh
-- Sufficiently advanced political correctness is indistinguishable from irony. -- Erik Naggum
- Previous message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Next message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]