[Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Dec 24 12:19:49 CET 2004
- Previous message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Next message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
On Dec 23, 2004, at 6:28 PM, Michael Hudson wrote:
Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl> writes:
Second question: I think the solution to peaceful coexistence is that all Pythons adopt the solution sketched in Bob's mail <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/2004-December/_ _012292.html>. That discussion is rather technical, but what it boils down to is that all Pythons (on 10.3) build their extensions with "-undefined dynamiclookup", thereby forestalling that extensions inadvertently pull in a second, different, Python framework. Side question: do we know yet if the Python shipped with tiger will get this right? I think this is checkable by people not under NDA, but if not at least those people who have seen Tiger previews can think about it :) They got it right in the Python 2.3.3 that was posted along with the Darwin 8.0b1 (?) sources, I'm pretty sure I pointed this out several times.
Quite possibly...
There is no reason to believe they will screw it up between then (WWDC) and now :)
Except that I tried to look for evidence of this in the WWDC source drop last night before posting and failed to find it... oh, is it in configure.ed? That seems a strange place to hang it, but oh well.
Cheers, mwh
-- It is never worth a first class man's time to express a majority opinion. By definition, there are plenty of others to do that. -- G. H. Hardy
- Previous message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Next message: [Pythonmac-SIG] Let's discuss MacPython distributions for january
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]