CIA oversees "war" on AIDS by Dr. Len Horowitz (original) (raw)

From the July 2000 Idaho Observer:

CIA oversees "war" on AIDS by Dr. Len Horowitz

On April 30, 2000, the The Washington Post announced a National Security Agency (NSA) move to place AIDS science, and all public health agencies conducting it, under the command of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This move, curiously, follows South African President's Thabo Mbeki's decision to include the testimonies of “dissident” scientists in his country's review of HIV/AIDS treatment practices and the epidemic's origin.

President Clinton, advised by the National Intelligence Council (NIC), to formally declare global AIDS a U.S. “national security threat,” signed this policy into law. The action foreshadows the likely persecution, if not incarceration or assassination, of “dissident” AIDS scientists.

The CIA warned in their report to the president and press that, “The persistent infectious disease burden is likely to aggravate and, in some cases, may even provoke economic decay, social fragmentation, and political destabilization in the hardest hit countries. . . .”

The study defined “instability,” as revolutionary wars, ethnic wars, genocides, and disruptive regime transitions. . . . Dramatic declines in life expectancy, the study said, are the strongest risk factor for “such threats to national security.”

Killing two birds with one stone, promoting vaccination and medication, the propagandist report stated that such threats and “deterioration” might be followed by only “limited improvement . . . owing to better prevention and control efforts, new drugs, and vaccines.”

The report posted one statistic that reflected the evidence advanced in the book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Intentional? (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1998). The “number of 15-year-olds per 10,000 of that age group who have lost their mothers or both parents to AIDS,” in Uganda, the report said, was 1,100 compared to 10 in the United States.

Why so many orphaned children in Uganda? Because this was the principle site of the African hepatitis B vaccine trials in 1974-1975. Uganda was the home of the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) that collaborated with Litton Bionetics, the U.S. Army's sixth top biological weapons contracting lab during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Bionetics was the organization that, at this time, developed numerous AIDS-like viruses under the direction of Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), who more than a decade later received credit for “discovering” the AIDS virus HTLV-III (HIV-1).

Given the potentially grave socioeconomic, political, and now military implications of uncovering a vaccine industry-linked cause of AIDS, future publications and open dialogue regarding this hypothesis in the mainstream and scientific media may be increasingly difficult to achieve. According to U.S. government watchdog groups, and related policy analysts linked to JuriMed -- a North American alternative medicine advocacy organization -- the new Clinton decree empowers the CIA to act against scientific “dissidents” who raise concerns regarding vaccination policies, as done in this article, as a threat to U.S. national security. The JuriMed communique heralded the likelihood of increased “mainstream [media] blackouts on AIDS dissident positions,” and “global disease control” initiatives including “wide-ranging vaccination programs” becoming more coercive.

Obviously, due to the lethal nature and severe cost of the AIDS pandemic, should this author's horrific documentation be largely disseminated, and the man-made origin of AIDS premise established firmly, it would beg a global reevaluation of vaccination science, politics, and policies. At least three third world nations, including the nation of Islam, Kenya, and now South Africa, have moved in this direction.

The man-made theory and vaccine-transmitted hypothesis of AIDS is not easily embraced. However, the implications of ignoring this hypothesis are unfathomable. Such actions strain the ethical fabric of science, our moral obligations as world citizens, and may be contributing to an irreversible attack against humanity.

On the other hand, the AIDS crisis may serve an ideologically justified function concerning burgeoning ethnic populations in a period of global transition. In effect, it provides a revenue-generating control mechanism for “national security” interests and the organizations, institutions, and industries alligned with what amounts to utilitarian global genocide.