January 2002: Re: Bare Naked Noah (original) (raw)
Next message: robert6625: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- Previous message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- In reply to: John W Burgeson: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- Next in thread: Adrian Teo: "RE: Bare Naked Noah"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Burgy wrote:
>According to the book, THE BIBLE AND HOMOSEXUAL PRACTICE, by Robert
>Gagnon, 2001, who appears to be a responsible scholar, the text uses
>oblique language to refer to what was almost certainly a case of the son
>raping Noah.
As to Ham's "orientation" there can be no question that he had children by
his wife, that tells me something. And I would think the cases of a
"switch hitter" having interest in a 600 year-old man, let alone that man
being his own father, would be rare indeed. Then, running out and telling
your brothers? Too bizarre for me.
Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago"
- Next message: robert6625: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- Previous message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- In reply to: John W Burgeson: "Re: Bare Naked Noah"
- Next in thread: Adrian Teo: "RE: Bare Naked Noah"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29: Sun Jan 27 2002 - 18:35:07 EST