Appendix 4. Comparison with RFC 1105 (original) (raw)
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Appendix 4. Comparison with RFC 1105
Up: Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up: Requests For Comments
Up: RFC 1771
Prev: Appendix 3. Comparison with RFC 1163
Next: Appendix 5. TCP options that may be used with BGP
Appendix 4. Comparison with RFC 1105
Appendix 4. Comparison with RFC 1105
All of the changes listed in Appendices 2 and 3, plus the following.
Minor changes to the RFC1105 Finite State Machine were necessary to accommodate the TCP user interface provided by 4.3 BSD.
The notion of Up/Down/Horizontal relations present in RFC1105 has been removed from the protocol.
The changes in the message format from RFC1105 are as follows:
- The Hold Time field has been removed from the BGP header and added to the OPEN message.
- The version field has been removed from the BGP header and added to the OPEN message.
- The Link Type field has been removed from the OPEN message.
- The OPEN CONFIRM message has been eliminated and replaced with implicit confirmation provided by the KEEPALIVE message.
- The format of the UPDATE message has been changed significantly. New fields were added to the UPDATE message to support multiple path attributes.
- The Marker field has been expanded and its role broadened to support authentication.
Note that quite often BGP, as specified in RFC 1105, is referred to as BGP-1, BGP, as specified in RFC 1163, is referred to as BGP-2, BGP, as specified in RFC1267 is referred to as BGP-3, and BGP, as specified in this document is referred to as BGP-4.
Next: Appendix 5. TCP options that may be used with BGP
Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Appendix 4. Comparison with RFC 1105