| 10:54 am - Hey Halliburton, what's your favorite color? |
|
| Sunday, December 9th, 2007 |
| 10:14 am - Have you checked out this philosophy podcast yet? |
|
| Tuesday, August 21st, 2007 |
| 7:05 pm - Impeachment Ale, etc. |
 dancing_nerd HA! I just found out that my very good friend, Lacy (a fellow conscientious dissenter), is going to attend graduate school in Boulder, Colorado, to get her PhD in psychology, so that she can help returning soldiers with PTSD. She is a true patriot*, and a credit to this country. (Direct Lacy-quote: I may hate the war, and I can't stop it, but I can at least help the soldier's coming back from it. Goddess, I love that girl!!!) Her beau, Zach, will be interning in a brewery. They plan to start their own brewery--Freedom Brew. They already brew at home in their spare bathroom, and are quite good, just ask  bigdude1800. (To give you an idea of their political views, they've already perfected a tasty peach-flavored brew by the name of Impeachment Ale, for which Lacy plans to design a funny little cartooney Bush label. She also mused to me about Cheney-themed pretzels, since she jokingly suspects Cheney of trying to pretzel-his-way-into the presidency a few years back.) Her news has renewed my sense of hope and passion. There are other patriots out there. There are others in this country that intend to fight for individual freedoms, for social justice, for human rights, for equality, to make this world a better place one person at a time (one beer at a time?) however they can, in any way, their own way. Their NOT satisfied with the status quo! They will NOT sit idly by as the United States falls apart around them. They take personal responsibility as citizens to make this country a better place to live. I love my country; I love what it could be, what it should be. I will not permanently emigrate, no matter how often I seriously consider it (though I will probably live abroad for a while just to get the life experience). I will keep fighting for what I know is right, no matter how tired or frustrated I get, because there are others out there fighting just as hard. And we WILL make a difference, I know we will--just look at how the whole "global warming" thing has turned out! Sure, it took 10+ years, but people are starting to listen. People are starting to recycle too--I even heard a conservative republican talk about the benefits about buying locally grown produce the other day. ) If any of you out there are boarder-line activists, or are activists/revolutionaries that don't realize you are (ah-herm, threerings everreese) take heart, don't let *all that crap* out there get you down. Good things are happening. They always are. Go listen to some patriotic music--whatever you consider that to be; Semper Paratus, Rage Against the Machine, Dixie Chicks, etc. You make a difference every day. Keep up the good work. To everyone on my flist--if any of you read this far--you ALL make a difference. For those of you I know in real life, I know you do good things, I know you affect those around you in positive ways. Keep it up. Keep the faith :) Go team! *Patriot assuming that true American interests include, but are not limited to: freedom of life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness, oh, hell, how about the right to a fair trial...universal healthcare, a decent education, a living wage; I'll stop there lest people claim I'm being unreasonable!EDIT: for some reason, my LJ link to madlawstudent (under activists that may not currently be aware of it) won't show up. You should check her out. She's awesome. (1 comment | comment on this) |
| Thursday, July 19th, 2007 |
| 9:54 am - Title X Funding Stuffs.... |
 dancing_nerd For those of you interested in family planning issues (and live in the states), you should be aware that Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) will offer an amendment to the Labor-Health and Human Services (HHS) spending bill that would prohibit Title X funds from being made available to Planned Parenthood health centers. **The debate on the Labor-HHS bill is currently underway and this vote could come up at any moment.**If you wish to write your representative (or wish to call them and need talking points), feel free to steal/direcly copy/use the letter I sent my representative which is found behind the cut. current mood:  cheerful (comment on this) |
| Wednesday, July 4th, 2007 |
| 9:03 am - Be a real patriot this Independance Day! |
|
| Monday, July 2nd, 2007 |
| 1:36 pm - Cut Pentagon Spending |
 dancing_nerd I've been accused of being naive and isolationist when I say we need to cut defense spending in order to shape up the rest of our nation. In this entry, I break down our national budget, explore the problems with the Pentagon, and explain why my point of view isn't completely whacked (ie. won't leave us defenseless and weak). current mood:  aggravated (1 comment | comment on this) |
| Friday, June 8th, 2007 |
| 12:29 pm - Campaign for Common Sense Reform in Food Aid |
 paddymac  With one common sense reform to the U.S. food aid program, we can save many more lives without spending one cent more. With your help, we can convince Congress to pass that reform. Read more. (comment on this) |
| Sunday, April 8th, 2007 |
| 7:26 am |
dancing_nerd Which of these philosophies do you ascribe to?1. Everything in moderation.2. Anything worth doing is worth doing to extremes.I suppose you could then add a third, modified version of #1: Everything in moderation, including moderation. I am torn between the responsibility and safety of #1, and the obvious zest for life that #2 represents (modified #1 just seems cheeky to me). I'm a 2 type of gal, but I am eager to hear reasons why #1 might be the way to go. I was raised with Ecclesiastes 9:10 drilled into my head; "Whatever presents itself for you to do, do it with all your might, because there is no work, planning, knowledge, or skill in the grave where you're going."You only live once (maybe), but you can get really hurt living to extremes.... current mood:  contemplative (6 comments | comment on this) |
| Wednesday, March 28th, 2007 |
| 8:54 am - Another Reality Check |
|
| Friday, March 23rd, 2007 |
| 4:42 am - Reality Check!!! |
|
| Thursday, March 15th, 2007 |
| 9:14 pm - Democratic BullCrapping Again!!! |
 everreese So now the Democrats are the kings of the hill, however it looks to me as if its the Same SHIT Different Toilet!!! "Nobody wants our troops out of Iraq more than I do," countered Rep. C.W. Bill Young (news, bio, voting record) of Florida, who sought unsuccessfully to scuttle the timeline for a troop withdrawal. "But we can't afford to turn over Iraq to al-Qaida."Shit Stinks People, wipe your asses and GET OFF THE TOILET!!!When your done, just put up a warning sticker that says " NO BODY GO IN THE BATHROOM FOR 25 TA 45 MINUTES" !!!WASHINGTON - Democrats aggressively challenged President Bush's Iraq policy at both ends of the Capitol on Thursday, gaining House committee approval for a troop withdrawal deadline of Sept. 1, 2008, but suffering defeat in the Senate on a less sweeping plan to end U.S. participation in the war. ADVERTISEMENT Anti-war Democrats prevailed on a near-party line vote of 36-28 in the House Appropriations Committee, brushing aside a week-old veto threat from the administration and overcoming unyielding opposition from Republicans."I want this war to end. I don't want to go to any more funerals," said New York Rep. Rep. Jose Serrano (news, bio, voting record), one of several liberal Democrats who have pledged their support for the legislation despite preferring a faster end to the war."Nobody wants our troops out of Iraq more than I do," countered Rep. C.W. Bill Young (news, bio, voting record) of Florida, who sought unsuccessfully to scuttle the timeline for a troop withdrawal. "But we can't afford to turn over Iraq to al-Qaida."In the Senate, after weeks of skirmishing, Republicans easily turned back Democratic legislation requiring a troop withdrawal to begin within 120 days. The measure set no fixed deadline for completion of the redeployment, but set a goal of March 31, 2008. The vote was 50-48 against the measure, 12 short of the 60 needed for passage.Senate Democrats promptly said they would try again to force a change in Bush's policy beginning next week when they begin work on legislation providing money for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.The developments coincided with the traditional St. Patrick's Day luncheon in the Capitol, an annual social event hosted by the speaker of the House and attended by the president. For an hour or so, while lawmakers were debating the war, Bush and the leader of the political opposition, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), were seated near one another in an ornate hall not far from the Capitol Rotunda.If they discussed the war, which has so far claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops, there was no evidence of it.The day's votes in Congress underscored the extraordinary, unpredictable wartime clash between commander in chief and lawmakers.In the House, only one committee Democrat, liberal Rep. Barbara Lee (news, bio, voting record) of California, voted against her party's plan, saying it did not go far enough. "I believe the American people sent a mandate to us to bring home our men and women before the end of the year," she said.Overall, the committee vote strongly suggested Democrats will be able to push their troop withdrawal timetable through the full House next week. Even so, there is little if any prospect the Senate will agree to anything remotely similar. And even if it does, Bush's threatened veto would force Pelosi and other war critics back to the drafting table.It took weeks for the Senate to agree to hold a formal debate on Democratic calls for a change in war policy, and by the time it occurred, the result was utterly predictable. So much so that Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), the Arizona Republican who is running for the White House in 2008, skipped the vote to campaign in Iowa.Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (news, bio, voting record) of Kentucky led the opposition to the measure."This is a dangerous piece of legislation. It is constitutionally dubious and it would authorize a scattered band of United States senators to tie the hand" of the commander in chief, he said.McConnell said it would be "absolutely fatal" to the mission of U.S. troops in Iraq.Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) of Nevada disputed that. "Five years of war, the president's current approach in Iraq is not working. The country is closer to chaos than stability. U.S. troops are policing a civil war, not hunting and killing the terrorists who attacked America on 9/11."While the Democratic defeat was preordained, New York Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record) of New York, who heads his party's campaign committee, suggested a political motive for the decision to go ahead with the vote.Republicans, he said, "are caught ... between the president who sticks to this policy and their constituencies, who know this policy is wrong." Sen. Gordon Smith (news, bio, voting record) of Oregon was the only Republican to support the measure. Democrats Mark Pryor (news, bio, voting record) of Arkansas and Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska opposed it, as did Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record) of Connecticut, an independent Democrat. For their part, Republicans sought to create a political dilemma for Democrats, countering with an alternative measure that said "no funds should be cut off or reduced for American troops in the field" that would undermine their safety. GOP leaders hoped the proposal, advanced by Sen. Judd Gregg (news, bio, voting record) of New Hampshire, would prove difficult for Democrats to oppose and complicate any future effort to reduce funds for the war. Gregg's amendment passed 82-16. Democrats tried still another proposal, this one saying that Congress would provide "necessary funds for training equipment and other support for troops in the field." It passed easily, 96-2. The House timetable was part of a spending bill that totals 124billion,124 billion, 124billion,95.5 billion of which is targeted for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Initially, Democrats had wanted to use the funding bill to prevent Bush from proceeding with his plans to increase troop strength by 21,000 as part of an effort to quell sectarian violence in the Baghdad area. That was scuttled after Republicans criticized it and moderate Democrats objected. In its place was a requirement for troops to receive proper training, equipment and rest, although Bush is permitted to waive those provisions. The balance of the funds in the House measure would be distributed among domestic programs that Democrats wanted to highlight — health care for veterans and low-income children, aid to agriculture and more. Republicans said that was a thinly disguised attempt to win support from reluctant Democrats. "Attention Kmart shoppers. ... Whether you be a spinach farmer or a salmon fisher ... there's something in there for you," taunted Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Ky. Rep. David Obey (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis., chairman of the committee, defended the billions of dollars for agricultural assistance, contending that many farmers are in difficult financial circumstances because of conditions beyond their control.current mood:  confused (comment on this) |
| Thursday, March 1st, 2007 |
| 4:27 am |
|
| Tuesday, February 27th, 2007 |
| 1:49 pm - Tomb of Jesus Found???? |
everreese Tomb of Jesus 'found in cave'23/02/2007 14:37 - (SA) St Paul's tomb unearthed Full house for Jesus movie Vatican canonises 4 new saints Jerusalem - The makers of a new documentary, to be aired for the first time at a news conference in New York on Monday, claim that a tomb found in a Jerusalem cave 36 years ago belongs to none other than Jesus Christ. The claim presented in the documentary is based on years of research by world-renowned archaeologists, statisticians, experts in ancient scripts and in DNA, the Israeli Yediot Ahronot daily on Friday quoted the makers as saying in an exclusive interview. The documentary, titled The Burial Cave of Jesus, is a joint production by Israeli-born Canadian documentary maker Simcha Jacobovici and three-time-Oscar-winning Canadian film director James Cameron (Titanic, The Terminator). The 2000-year-old cave had already been discovered in 1980 in Jerusalem's Talpiyot neighbourhood. In it were 10 coffins, six of which bore inscriptions, which - translated into English - included the names "Jesus son of Joseph," twice "Maria," and "Judah son of Jesus." Did Jesus have a son? The second Maria is hypothesised to be Maria Magdalene, while the tomb bearing the name Judah could indicate Jesus had a son. If true, the find could be one of the most significant in the history of archeology and shake the Christian world. But the senior Israeli archaeologist who thoroughly researched the tombs after their discovery, and at the time deciphered the inscriptions, cast serious doubt on it. "It's a beautiful story but without any proof whatsoever," Professor Amos Kloner, who had published the findings of his research in the Israeli periodical Atigot in 1996, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa Friday. "The names that are found on the tombs are names that are similar to the names of the family of Jesus," he conceded. "But those were the most common names found among Jews in the first centuries BCE and CE," he added. Kloner dismissed the combination of names found in the cave as a "coincidence." The Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA), which is keeping the caskets in its archive in the town of Beit Shemesh near Jerusalem, declined to comment on the documentary, saying it had not researched the caskets and that its duty was only to safeguard them. The IAA nevertheless sent two of the caskets to the news conference in New York. The documentary, which took three years to make, is to be broadcast on the World Discovery Channel, Britain's Channel 4, Canada's Vision and Israel's Channel 8, which participated in its production. Wow! There are so many comments about this, mostly that the scientist along with a Jewish conspiracy is trying to debunk Christianity. Well it isn't like this hasn't been going on on all since any can remember, however my only observation that I would like to mention is that if Jesus was suppose to have risen from the dead, then why would their be any bones?Unless, when he rose he rose in the spirit and left his body behind. That would be normal to me. When people die and revisit families and friends they are in the spirit and not the body. However his believes claimed to have touched him???I say that still a spirit has the ability, if they know how, to manifest themselves physically. I think a "knowledgable" teacher such as Jesus can do this. Lastly, the bible describe some of his followers as unable to recognize him.I feel that when he did return, or rise, his spirit/physical manifestation was definately different then his earthly appearance because "they" didn't recognise him at first, and did comment that he looked different. I am interested to see, what becomes of this... I wonder if this is the prelude to the coming or the revealing of the identity of the Anti-Christ???current mood:  anxious (comment on this) |
| Saturday, February 24th, 2007 |
| 3:55 am - Power of Communication Part II (Lucifer Son of the Morning) |
| everreese Power of Langage and Comm 2 ( Lucifer? More of my Craziness) Current mood: crazy Power of Language and Communications 2: (Lucifer Son of the Morning?) Speaking of "Amen", I assume that many of you whom have received these emails are some "sort" of Christians or believers in Christ if not all of you. I ask you then why do we say "AMEN" at the end of our prayers and exclamations? AMEN is an Egyptian God! Can anyone explain that? I find it weird that it is all over the bible. I will research to see if it is in the Quran and the Torah. If anyone can assist me please feel free to email me your results and please share them with us all. I think it is important. My personal thought is that is that, like so many others, it is a mis-translation or misunderstanding that ended up in the bible. For example: In the bible they call the devil Lucifer, however the word Lucifer is a Greek originating name, meaning " The Morning Star or Day Star" vs. Sami'el which is the Hebrew name for the devil meaning "he who is against God or hewho goes against" or Satanel which means the accuser which is in the Torah. (Samael is an important figure in Talmudic and post-Talmudic lore, a figure who is accuser, seducer, and destroyer. Legends mentioning Satan refer equally to him, such that Samael is often taken to be the true or angelic name of the Devil~~~~~ Satan, from the Hebrew word for "accuser is a term with its origins in the Abrahamic faiths which is traditionally applied to an angel. Ha-Shatan is the accuser, a member of the divine council, who challenged the religious faith of humans, especially in the books of Job and Zechariah. Religious belief systems other than Judaism relate this term to a demon, a rebellious fallen angel, devil, minor god and idolatry, or as an allegory for evil.) I was doing a bible study on this and this study went into really deep explanation of how the bible was mistranslated because there are words in Aramaic (a Semitic language of the Hebrews) that don't translate into Greek, and furthermore English. The scripture stating " O'Lucifer the son of the morning, how thou hast fallen" (Isaiah 14,12) is explain in this study as a parable describing the "Pride" of a King Nebuchadnezzar whom GOD had cast down because of his ego not referring to the being Satan. The irony for those who believe that "Lucifer" refers to Satan is that the same title ('morning star' or 'light-bearer') is used to refer to Jesus, in 2 Peter 1:19, where the Greek text has exactly the same term: 'phos-phoros' 'light-bearer.' This is also the term used for Jesus in Revelation 22:16. I know many of you ask where I am going with this. Well this is a comprehensive evaluation illuminating the very point of how Language is a Power that is often abused by us everyday. The Christian scholar Jerome whom translated the bible from Greek to English wasn't wrong in what he translated, however later scholars, poets, etc equated Lucifer with Satan and the myth evolved, and are taught without regret to our children. The name itself has a negative connotation when originally it had a positive one. Question, who names their child Lucifer?? No one I know. I am by no means stating the true essence or "Truth" of the bible is wrong, only that you have to really meditate on the words and commune with God to understand this is a mistake. When you have awakened to this simple truth, others will be revealed. For instance the whole women shouldn't wear pants. This is a system passed on to the "Hebrews" in the old testament, and was abolished by Jesus himself when he stated the laws where guide lines for the Hebrews because the "word" had not yet manifested among them. The "Word" is Jesus. A lot of those Hebrew laws where to help the Hebrews stay focused on GOD until the arrival of the Messiah. It is an Irony how preachers preach this today to state that women can't wear pants. It is a form of control. This revelation is clear with the equality Jesus treated all the women that followed him.Also, in my spiritual quest, I have taking the debunkers of the word of God and proven via science and logic that the Bible in essence is correct. Combining that with faith and powerful awareness has come to me. Many debate me. They say that I am not being faithful, that I am not allowing God to lead me blindly. I say to those that think that, "the blind lead the blind", God never intended for us to be slaves of ignorance, true freedom is seeking him. This can be done many ways, via pray, meditation, or knowledge enhancement. Jesus stated that all ways lead to him and through him to the Father. All ways?? That means there are many ways to Jesus, is this the reason for different religions?? I will seek that answer soon. I am well on my way to it because in Paul he hits on it that the Holy Spirit will come in many forms, persons, and signs. I know one can further point to Adam, Eve, the serpent and the Fruit Tree, however no one stopped to think that one day, maybe not the time the sin occurred but one day we were meant to have the fruit, when God gave it to us. Now that Jesus has come, now is the time for man to rise from blissful ignorance and be aware of the wonders of GOD outside of him, i.e. Angels (Aliens???) advance science and technology. I would think so, the last time mankind became so technologically awarded God separated us (The story of Babylon) however there has been a slow step by step progression not only in technology but in spirituality. Believe me it all goes hand in hand.Lastly, for those Gung-Ho bible fanatics, please do not judge me or my words, instead take the time to reflect on them. My path to GOD is not yours, but a path that I walk only with Jesus. Yours maybe not to contemplate these "mysteries" however I have a deep understanding with the Lord that mine iscurrent mood: contemplative (2 comments | comment on this) |
| 3:53 am - Power of Communications Part 1 |
| everreese Socrates said, "The misuse of language induces evil in the soul." He wasn't talking about grammar. To misuse language is to use it the way politicians and advertisers do, for profit, without taking responsibility for what the words mean. Language used as a means to get power or make money goes wrong: it lies. Language used as an end in itself, to sing a poem or tell a story, goes right, goes towards the truth.SAVA'S Response-> That is on point buddy as you can see the correlation in Right Speech in the Buddhist Philosophy. Words used for personal gain are nothing more then selfish manipulations that ultimately only bring suffering and destruction.Exactly! Also leads me to another point. See Politicians, Scientists, Theologist, etc, use power of language. Often with just a thought language can be mis-used. When a person tells a straight up lie; "The sky is falling", normally everyone knows it for what it is. The lie resonates throughout your spirit as "wrong", however when for example a politician speaks, the lie doesn't instantly resonate. The reason being it is cloaked with Half-truths. Mixed with truths and self-brainwashing to believe the lies, these politicians manipulate and control our society. These "cloaked" lies send mixed signals. Mixed signals are better for their purposes than direct signals because they cause doubt. Doubt is all that is needed for manipulation to work at its apex. Worse thing is that we are "sleepwalkers" Reason I say that is for example, 911, too much information leads to the truth, which illustrates that this was a terrible incident launched by our own clandestine government. Why? Why then have we not "revolted"? Instead America as a whole simply sleepwalks, they comment, just like those that talk in there sleep but have not awakened to act. I know the reasons why, the very core values of the spirit we cherish are at risk, Family, Friend, Career, Comfort ability. So we will wag our tails, huff and puff about change, but people like Dick Chaney are still in office doing what they do. All this is done by the control of communication whether it is language, media, or science. Man, it is absolutely a fuckin shame that we can't have trust in our own spiritual media like the Bible, Qur'an, and Torah. That we intimately know that following the text blindly condemn our spirituality, yet in not doing so shows no faith and condemn us again, it is a double-edged blade, either way your fucked. I just want to spread a correct verbal communication to my friends and loved one; "with great power comes great responsibility" (Uncle Ben to Peter Parker aka Spider Man) Know that "Words" are a form of that great power and you have a responsibility and accountability to everyone you speak to. So, tell the truth, if you can't simply state you can't. If you identify this flaw you can then take action to correct it. Understand that sometimes the truth hurts and if it will destroy someone, then it is best to understand that it may not be time to reveal it. Sometimes the truth needs time. If you find yourself communicating arrogantly, angrily or condescendingly then take a time out to "check your programming" then re-communicate the message with "compassion, understanding and respect" you will find that this sort of communication is liberating because people "get it". If we learn to master our communication we can enjoy our "awareness" so much more. I see the wrestling of this communication error as one of the multiple steps to understanding the spirit and ultimately "God". "Right speech will lead you to a full circle to Right Actions, Right Thoughts and ultimately to Right Living"EverReese (4 comments | comment on this) |
| Friday, February 9th, 2007 |
| 5:58 pm - Not Again!!! |
| everreese The Iranian Smoke Screen! War again?? How Un-American!!!Gates describes Iraq evidence against Iran Serial numbers and markings on explosives used in Iraq provide "pretty good" evidence that Iran is providing either weapons or technology for militants there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserted Friday. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17064803/from/ET/Man! Do these dudes no how to beat the same Drum or what??First weapons of mass destruction, now "pretty good" evidence that Iran is providing weapons to the Iraq rebels. Ok, Oh Well. Were not we providing the Afghani weapons, training and Intel vs. the Russians?? Were we not providing Haddam with weapons at first. Jeez, I am so damn tired of the current presidency regime's Fascist Righteous, anybody not for us is against us mentality. We very well may see our poor relatives be shipped out to war with IRAN! I pray that will not happen. Iran isn't a backwater country, it is very sophisticated and technologically advanced, as well as a highly trained military. We will not walk in and defeat them, it will be a real war on the scale of Vietnam or maybe worse. What saddens me most is that my Fellow American's don't do diddly squat!As long as we have MTV, the Internet, IPods, Reality T.V., Cable, Sports, Beer, Clubbing and our so called Freedom, we sit by and watch.We watch as the government take away the very freedoms our constitution was build on from us, and we sit idly by as our government "colonizes" the Middle East with "Democracy"...Don't believe me??Check out http://www.nesara.us/pages/history.htmlhttp://www.freedomtofascism.com/http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/Or Perhaps do the unthinkable; "Your Own Damn Research" Yea, that's right I said it it, and if you don't like it, I dare you to know this chip of wood of my shoulders! Come on I dare ya!!I once told a Minister that I socialize with on a regular that most "Christians" I know, would rather be preached the Bible, then read it themselves. They would rather be told "What Scripture" and "How to understand it" as oppose to finding some self-ownership in the beauty of the holy bible.To take it to another level, We Americans would rather it be on T.V. then outside our doors in the front lawn. Believe me friends you don't want the shit outside your windows. We have no idea what it is like to have 10 yr olds running outside our homes with AK 47s slaughtering, raping and pillaging for fun. Yeah, I know a little extreme, however I tell you this in 2008 the law goes into effect that every American Citizen has to have a Federal I.D. this will have your thumb print on it. It is in discussion now to electronically tag these id's. Man you can't buy anything with your credit card that is not tracked. As far as cash, ever been asked by the cashier what is your zip code? So go far as asking your phone number. They say this is for business surveys and the like. BULLSHIT!!! You think I am paranoid? Damn right I am, Paranoia doesn't make me wrong! It doesn't exclude the truth, that your civil liberties have been molested since the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank.I tell you this as well all my friends, it is coming a time when "They" will come and take me away for the things I am saying, the organizations I am becoming affiliated with, and the way I thinks. When they do, use it as a example to finally ask yourself a question.Will you live Truth or Die lying, will you Live Free or Die Enslave. When you reach judgment and the Lord Christ ask you "Did you die for me"? What can you say? What is dying for the Lord, well it is simple, Love. If you love as the Lord says then saying no to and taking action against Fascism, Racism, and all the negative isms out there is dying for the Lord.The Lord will ask of you a sacrifice of what you hold most dear...That is in your bible people. Here in America we hold our "Freedom" most dear, and it is being paid for with a terrible price. What Price? Watch Tears of the Sun, Watch Hotel Rwanda, Watch Black Hawk Down, Watch Blood Diamonds, to name a freaking few. Even if your not "RELIGIOUS", which I hope most of you are not, I know you understand the Idea of FREEDOM, LIBERTY, and RIGHTS. Well guess what, you don't have the right to vote anymore, the right to alternative medical treatment, the right to bear arms, the right to the truth...From 1913 till today this country has been nothing but enslaved monkeys dancing to the tune of our own addictions and passions. "It is paramount that we protect America's super power and superiority"A quote from our next President Hilary Clinton...The shit don't change, just the toilet paper!GET OFF THE TOILET PEOPLE, THE SHIT STINKS!!!current mood: pissed off (10 comments | comment on this) |
| Saturday, January 27th, 2007 |
| 11:23 pm - Don't Let Me Near DC Anymore |
 resident_raptor **No worries, I'll end up debating later, but I figured some of you political heads (who probably need a little break from the seriousness and the heat) might enjoy one of my recent stunts.**So, basically there was this protest in DC I was supposed to go to. But sadly the bus was packed and it cost more to go down there than I thought. Luckily around 200 people were in the same boat I was so they protested around campus. They were chanting and holding posters that basically said: 'Bush is a liar'. I however opted for my own personal sign and quote which was: "George Bush do not fib, bring back the effing McRibb!" I also rallied to get McNuggets on the dollar menu. I ended up getting my photo taken for some paper and I must say, I probably look very furious in my quest. But it did lighten the mood a bit, in my defense. (comment on this) |
| Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007 |
| 9:33 pm - Incoherency of Sex??? |
| everreese This is based of conversations between myself and another friend of mine evolutions_son on live journalHere is his response to me. I find it interesting and would like to know how others think?Sex is a powerful force as it is the physical manifestation of the creative >power of the universe. In the universe all things exist in a coherent >fashion which we refer to as Nature or Mother Nature. It is important to >understand that sex is natural and a part of Nature. Nature for all >intents >and purposes is life. Esoterically sex is a powerful generating center and >producer of electro-magnetic energy which continuously vibrates like >electricity. This power emanates directly from the original source, that >is >from God, and its mission is the maintenance of life. It is due to this >that life emanates from sex and from there, it is transmitted to the >different centers of the body. Life is an eternal and continuous >generation. Nothing can exist that has not been created by two forces, one >passive or feminine and the other, active or masculine. In man(kind) is >manifested the active or positive force of creative power and due to this, >he does not have control over his instincts which at certain times, place >him on the level of an animal which procreates impelled by magnetic >currents. > > > >Sex is the great producer, regulator, and director of life, but it is also >the great hypnotizer that keeps the human species in the mechanical (or >sleep) state. The Bible says that the serpent tempted Adam and Eve to eat >the forbidden fruit and that their giving into that temptation was the >cause >for their expulsion from Paradise. In this context, Paradise symbolizes >the >state wherein man is in permanent conscious contact with his own spirit. >This expulsion from Paradise represents the loss of this contact when men >surrendered to uncontrolled passion. By surrendering to his passions and >by >using sex indiscriminately, he little by little lost his faculty for >perceiving reality because his sensorial impressions were so numerous and >continuous as to perturb his mental function. > > > >When the objective of the sexual act is to beget a child, it is an act of >creation, and each time a birth takes place, a force is produced, either >good or evil, according to the quality of the union, that is to say, if it >had been purely bestial or spiritual. Let's stop for a moment and grasp an >understanding of what is meant by good and evil. In the first paragraph it >was explained that electro-magnetic energy continuously vibrates. It >should >be understood that all matter in existence, both seen and unseen >(immaterial), vibrate continuously. As vibrations slow down they become >dense and this produces matter, and at the same time, as vibrations speed >up >they become less dense and more immaterial, ethereal, and celestial. When >man surrendered to his earthly physical (dense/low vibrations) passions he >lost contact with his spirit (high vibrations) as mentioned above, so with >that said, and understanding that man's current purpose is to reconnect >with >his spirit (aka Paradise/Heaven on Earth), anything that keeps man focused >on the dense vibrations is considered to be evil, and likewise, anything >that keeps man focused on the spiritual is considered good. So it is also >understood that when a person commits a sin they are actually experiencing >an incoherent state that is totally focused in the realm of dense >vibrations >and lacking conscious connection to the spirit. > > > >When there is only a union of bodies and not of the souls, which is the >most >common, it is the same as mechanically stimulating the sexual centers, >producing perpetual dissatisfaction. Only with the simultaneous union of >body and soul, is there a real deep and intimate spiritual and divine >pleasure in the true sexual union. This is the difference between sinning >and not sinning as far as this problem is concerned. The ones who sin are >the ones who join themselves like animals. It is not sufficient for a >marriage to be legalized by the church to have the grace of God, as in >Nature there are no human laws. From the viewpoint of Nature, which is >perfect, a marriage consists of any couple who have formed a matrimonial >aura, which is the union of their spirits. When this matrimonial aura is >absent, a marriage can still be legalized and blessed by the church, but it >will be false and a lie as there will only have been a coupling of bodies. > > > >Now that we have a greater understanding of sex let's examine what types of >sex are coherent and incoherent. The number one purpose of sex is to >procreate, to generate life, but as explained above there must also be >present a matrimonial aura or spiritual union between the two partners. >This spiritual union represents love for one another and a conscious choice >to join together. When both (spiritual union and procreation) are present >man and woman are in total coherency with Nature and Spirit. Anytime a man >or woman has sex for purely physical stimulation and pleasure they are >acting in incoherent sin because they are choosing to focus themselves >totally in flesh and not in spirit. This is also the case with >homosexuality. There is no procreation possible between members of the >same >sex thus any sexual union between members of the same sex is perverted and >total focused on passionate dense vibrations. This is not to say that a >man >can not love another man or that a woman can not love another woman, but >there is an infinite amount of ways to express and share love for one >another without sex. Love is not based in dense vibrations; it is actually >the exact opposite as love is the quintessential vibration of our Spirits >and God. In our current society we are taught that we should express our >love sexually and with this homosexuals have fought for equal rights to >express their love. The problem is that homosexuals are fighting for a >right from heterosexual society that has a totally distorted understanding >of sex. The number one and only purpose for sex is for procreation, that's >it! It is possible for any and all humans to share a spiritual union among >one another as this is our true peaceful loving spiritual state, however >this has nothing to do with sex, but instead with everyday living. > > > >Let me end this by saying that I have lived in sin as sin is defined here. >We all are going to make mistakes, we all are going to fall down, but what >matters is that we get back up. No matter your race, gender, religion, or >geographical location we all desire the same thing: Peace. That peace is >with God and with our Spirits as they are God's creation made in His image. >Only when mankind, as a whole, reconnects with Spirit will we achieve peace >or heaven on earth. Do not condemn your brothers and sisters because they >fall to incoherency, but instead offer them your love and support. If one >consciously chooses to live in sin be careful of your interaction with him >as to not influence yourself to do the same, but do not judge him or you >will surely share the same fate, instead accept him and love him >unconditionally so he may be touched by the love of Spirit and God. Love >God, Love YourSelf, & Love One Another.current mood: contemplative (5 comments | comment on this) |
| 8:53 pm - Incunabula Planners and LERM |
| everreese Hello All, I recently was directed to this web site and read over the interviews. It was very interesting indeed. The information reveals a lot about the new "conspiracies" that have evolved of late (at least to my knowledge) as well as some interesting theories and thoughts about "world conciousness". I just wanted to get feed back from others. The interviews are too long to post here so I will give the web link info. http://www.wingmakers.com/neruda4ex.htmlPost back here your thoughts or research conclusions about the information given and discussed. I have copied and pasted some information on one of the terminologies used in the interview, LERM:Introduction L.E.R.MAs light beings we have the ability to manifest physical forms of matter. The way this is done is by projecting an electromagnetic field of energy with the source code of creation into a holographic image of an object that we desire. This is done by projecting light particles from the kundalini energy at the base of the spine into the sixth chakra and projecting the kundalini's electromagnetic field of manifestation to a point just in front of us. This is known as quantum mechanics and is the natural law of quantum physics in the universe known as the Light Encoded Reality Matrix or LERM. The way that we do this is by projecting an holographic image of an object into a quantum electromagnetic field and surrounding the holographic object with the quantum field and blending it with the holographic object creating a quantum object of physical matter. Physical Technique Step One I want you to get comfortable and relax. Step Two Then visualize the sixth chakra. At the base of chakra there is a well of energy this well is known as the jewel of the lotus. Within the jewel there is a light golden energy. Visualize that this golden energy is trickling out of the jewel and spreading out into the chakra. As the chakra spins see the chakra becoming golden in colour with its light radiant energy. Step three Now in your own time project that light golden energy to a point in front of you and create a electromagnetic field. If it helps picture this electromagnetic field as a golden cloud. Step Four Then focus on an image of your desire and projecting that image into the electromagnetic field and make sure the electromagnetic field is completely surrounding that object. Step Five Then in your own time blend the electromagnetic field with the object and see the object taking form. see it transforming into physical matter and make sure the object is forming with no imperfection's. Step Six As the object forms then instruct quantum object to ground into the physical plain of solid matter. Step Seven When you think you have got a solid object in front of you open your eyes. And remember this is not teleportation. This is creation from light and also remember the wingmakers code because we seek the service and protect humanity as wingmakers. Tips & Hints If you have trouble grounding the object try draw a hara line down into the earth and ground the object that way and if that doesn't work try blending energy from the core star with the object and see whatcurrent mood: contemplative (1 comment | comment on this) |
| Sunday, December 17th, 2006 |
| 7:21 pm - Nurture vs. Nature (sort of) |
 thesebloodyfeet Lately I've been hearing from different family members (as they gossip) how someone "wasn't raised to be that way". Personally, I've never been a fan of this line of thinking. It's almost as if people expect a child to be carbon copies of their parents, and that is wrong in my opinion. I guess free will and thought don't exist to some people. Personally, I'm nothing like what I "was raised to be", but I do know some people who are. I think this is because children are like their parents until they become old enough to decide for themselves if that is the way they want to be. I was just wondering what everyone thought about the nature vs. nurture question. Obviously, psychologists have decided that it is a mix of the two, but which does everyone think it is more of? The way a person is raised or their own free thought that makes their personality and ethics?Sorry if this doesn't make much sense, I'm a little out of it at the moment.current mood:  blah (6 comments | comment on this) |