Making the Impossible Possible: Rooting the Tree of Placental Mammals (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

1School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Search for other works by this author on:

2Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

Emma C. Teeling, S. Blair Hedges, Making the Impossible Possible: Rooting the Tree of Placental Mammals, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 30, Issue 9, September 2013, Pages 1999–2000, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst118
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Untangling the root of the evolutionary tree of placental mammals has been nearly an impossible task. The good news is that only three possibilities are seriously considered. The bad news is that all three possibilities are seriously considered. Paleontologists favor a root anchored by Xenarthra (e.g., sloths and anteater), whereas molecular evolutionists have favored the two other possible roots: Afrotheria (e.g., elephants, hyraxes, and tenrecs) and Atlantogenata (Afrotheria + Xenarthra). Now, two groups of researchers have scrutinized the largest available genomic data sets bearing on the question and have come to opposite conclusions, as reported in this issue of Molecular Biology and Evolution. Needless to say, more research is needed.

Living mammals (∼5,500 species) exist in every biome on earth and are considered to be one of the most phenotypically diverse groups of vertebrates (Wilson and Reeder 2005). Approximately 95% of mammals are placentals, and their evolutionary relationships have rapidly come into focus through dozens of molecular analyses over the past two decades. By any standard, the change has been revolutionary, from the paleontological view of an explosive, post-dinosaur radiation with hoofed mammals (e.g., horses, cattle, and elephants) joined in a group (Novacek 1999) to the molecular view of deeper origins, reflecting Earth history (Hedges et al. 1996; Meredith et al. 2011). However, despite the abundance and congruence of most molecular phylogenetic studies there are still major nodes in the molecular tree of mammals that remain unresolved and highly controversial.

Two articles in this issue (Morgan et al. 2013; Romiguier et al. 2013) address one such node, the root of the tree of living placental mammals, and come to different conclusions. The timing of the splitting event—approximately 100 Ma based on molecular clocks—is not in debate, at least among molecular evolutionists (Hedges et al. 1996; Meredith et al. 2011). Rather the question is the branching order of the three major lineages: afrotherians (e.g., elephants, manatees, hyraxes, elephant shrews, aardvarks, and tenrecs), xenarthrans (sloths, anteaters, and armadillos), and boreoeutherians (all other placentals; fig. 1). If we speak of the root as the earliest splitting branch with fewest species, paleontologists prefer a xenarthran root (O’Leary et al. 2013), whereas molecular studies have equally supported the two other possibilities: an Afrotherian root and Atlantogenata (Afrotheria + Xenarthra). Researchers have found this node to be one of the “hardest” to resolve in the mammalian phylogenetic tree, if not impossible (Nishiara et al. 2009). The hope has been that large phylogenomic studies, despite their statistical challenges (Kumar et al. 2012), will solve this puzzle (Murphy et al. 2007).

Fig. 1.

The root of the evolutionary tree of living placental mammals. (a) Afrotherian root, (b) Xenarthran root, and (c) Atlantogenatan root.

Both Morgan et al. (2013) and Romiguier et al. (2013) concatenate and analyze some of the largest phylogenomic mammalian data sets to date. Morgan et al. (2013) utilize heterogenous models to account for tree and dataset heterogeneity and find strong support for Atlantogenata. They argue that the “unresolvability” of the placental root stems from the past use of suboptimal models and smaller data sets with little power. Romiguier et al. (2013), on the other hand, divide their data set into GC- and AT-rich genes, analyzing the support for the alternate roots. They show that GC-rich genes are most likely to support egregious topologies and suffer from long-branch attraction, whereas AT-rich genic regions had a five times lower error rate. Interestingly, AT-rich genes support an Afrotherian root, whereas GC-rich genes support Atlantogenata, leading Romiguier et al. (2013) to conclude that the placental rooting conflict stems from unreliable GC-rich genes being used to build phylogenies. This finding could explain why similar coalescent analyses of different regions of the genome supported different roots: ultraconserved noncoding elements predominantly found in AT-rich isochores support an Afrotherian rooting (McCormack et al. 2012), whereas coding regions with higher GC content support Atlantogenata (Song et al. 2012). Considering the current deluge of whole genome data, it is important to continue developing methods like these to analyze heterogeneous data sets correctly and, in some cases, combining methods may be fruitful.

What is the significance of knowing the correct root? First, it may help us understand how traits evolved that are shared among major groups of placental mammals. Second, it will have biogeographic implications. The fact that xenarthrans and afrotherians are so closely tied to South America and Africa, respectively, continents that separated at about the same time (∼100 Ma) as those groups, is hard to ignore, suggesting that some vicariance was involved regardless of the root. If, on the other hand, Afrotheria arose in the New World (O’Leary et al. 2013), then the biogeographic story is not as simple. Clearly, we have more to learn about the early evolution of placental mammals.

References

Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals

,

Nature

,

1996

, vol.

381

(pg.

226

-

229

)

Statistics and truth in phylogenomics

,

Mol Biol Evol.

,

2012

, vol.

29

(pg.

457

-

472

)

Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species tree analysis

,

Genome Res.

,

2012

, vol.

22

(pg.

746

-

754

)

et al. ,

(22 co-authors)

.

Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification

,

Science

,

2011

, vol.

334

(pg.

521

-

524

)

Heterogeneous models place the root of the placental mammal phylogeny

,

Mol Biol Evol.

,

2013

, vol.

30

(pg.

2145

-

2156

)

Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny

,

Genome Res.

,

2007

, vol.

17

(pg.

413

-

421

)

Retroposon analysis and recent geological data suggest near simultaneous divergence of the three superorders of mammals

,

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.

,

2009

, vol.

106

(pg.

5235

-

5240

)

100 million years of land vertebrate evolution: the cretaceous-early tertiary transition

,

Ann Missouri Bot Garden.

,

1999

, vol.

86

(pg.

230

-

258

)

et al. ,

(23 co-authors)

.

The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals

,

Science

,

2013

, vol.

339

(pg.

662

-

667

)

Less is more in mammalian phylogenomics: AT-rich genes minimize tree conflicts and unravel the root of placental mammals

,

Mol Biol Evol.

,

2013

, vol.

30

(pg.

2124

-

2144

)

Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model

,

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.

,

2012

, vol.

109

(pg.

14942

-

14947

)

,

Mammal species of the world

,

2005

Baltimore (MD)

Johns Hopkins University Press

Author notes

Associate editor: Sudhir Kumar

© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 2,582

1,118 Pageviews

1,464 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 1
January 2017 4
February 2017 20
March 2017 11
April 2017 13
May 2017 6
June 2017 14
July 2017 2
August 2017 11
September 2017 12
October 2017 13
November 2017 17
December 2017 48
January 2018 45
February 2018 52
March 2018 52
April 2018 39
May 2018 121
June 2018 23
July 2018 17
August 2018 21
September 2018 27
October 2018 31
November 2018 43
December 2018 52
January 2019 35
February 2019 18
March 2019 35
April 2019 33
May 2019 42
June 2019 37
July 2019 30
August 2019 40
September 2019 47
October 2019 45
November 2019 31
December 2019 43
January 2020 42
February 2020 36
March 2020 25
April 2020 33
May 2020 19
June 2020 33
July 2020 20
August 2020 26
September 2020 43
October 2020 58
November 2020 23
December 2020 21
January 2021 18
February 2021 25
March 2021 56
April 2021 41
May 2021 20
June 2021 26
July 2021 28
August 2021 22
September 2021 20
October 2021 37
November 2021 32
December 2021 27
January 2022 29
February 2022 54
March 2022 22
April 2022 20
May 2022 30
June 2022 24
July 2022 27
August 2022 30
September 2022 19
October 2022 30
November 2022 27
December 2022 28
January 2023 19
February 2023 26
March 2023 20
April 2023 19
May 2023 21
June 2023 10
July 2023 21
August 2023 18
September 2023 6
October 2023 17
November 2023 17
December 2023 16
January 2024 12
February 2024 22
March 2024 15
April 2024 20
May 2024 15
June 2024 27
July 2024 22
August 2024 15
September 2024 12
October 2024 10

Citations

24 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic