Diana Falco | SUNY: University at Albany (original) (raw)

Papers by Diana Falco

As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, it is of paramount import... more As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, it is of paramount importance to re-examine Justice Thurgood Marshall's hypotheses. In Justice Marshall's second hypothesis in his concurring opinion, he suggested "people who were fully informed' regarding the death penalty "would find the penalty, shocking, unjust and unacceptable" (p. 361). While there has been much empirical testing of this hypothesis, the intent of this study is to add to the existing literature by examining whether different methods of information delivery produce senti- ments in opposition to capital punishment. The main research question to be tested is as follows: does exposure to information have more of an impact on opinions if it is given in-person or in online/hybrid formats? Data were collected by an instructor who taught death penalty classes (n= 143) utilizing different teaching modalities. Results suggest that method of course delivery is mar- ginally significantly related to change in opposition towards capital punishment. More specifically, hybrid/online offerings were more likely to result in increased opposition towards the death penalty after taking the class. Furthermore, the analysis also revealed a significant relationship between teaching modality and level of death penalty knowledge at post-test. In light of recent developments in higher education resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is also beneficial to conduct research that has important implications as colleges and universities come to grips with a new normal in distance learning.

As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, the time is ripe for a re... more As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, the time is ripe for a renewed empirical test of the hypotheses Justice Marshall presented in his concurring opinion. Most relevant to this study, he suggested in his second proposition that "people who were fully informed as to the purposes of the penalty and its liabilities would find the penalty, shocking, unjust and unacceptable." While there has been much empirical testing of this hypothesis, the intent of this study is to add to the existing literature by examining whether specific types of information about capital punishment is associated with opposition to capital punishment. Data were collected by an instructor who taught death penalty classes (n = 122 subjects) to test this hypothesis. Results provide qualified support for Marshall's second hypothesis that knowledge is significantly related to an increase in death penalty opposition. Moreover, the following factors were significant predictors of overall change in participants' opinion: cost, deterrence, race of victim, and evolving societies. Surprisingly, the innocence items did not appear statistically significant in altering opinions. Future research should

Dissertation Chair: Dr. Jamie S. Martin Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Kate Hanrahan, Dr. Jo... more Dissertation Chair: Dr. Jamie S. Martin Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Kate Hanrahan, Dr. John Lewis, and Dr. Jennifer Roberts

Strong public support for capital punishment is arguably the number one reason why the death pena... more Strong public support for capital punishment is arguably the number one reason why the death penalty continues to be used as a form of correctional policy in the U.S. criminal justice system. Therefore, it is fundamental that the measure of death penalty opinion be heavily scrutinized. Utilizing a methodological approach not typically employed in this area, the current study conducted six focus groups to gain a better understanding of the complexity of these opinions. During the focus groups, participants were asked to state their general beliefs concerning the death penalty, respond to scenarios, and respond to research findings regarding the death penalty (i.e., costs, deterrence, wrongful convictions, race, etc.). The findings suggest that participants' views regarding the death penalty are more multifaceted than previously believed. This study further suggests that current methods used to measure public support of the death penalty fail to capture the complexity of sentiment on this issue. Over the past few decades American correctional policy has focused on a " get tough " approach toward crime and punishment. In order to cast themselves as " tough on crime, " both Democrats and Republicans have continuously supported measures to increase the punishment allocated to criminal offenders. The most punitive type of punishment in the United States is arguably the death penalty. Unlike other types of punishments (such as prison or jail), the death penalty is the only punishment with a mobilized opposition that continues to fight against its use. Political leaders, criminal justice administrators, judges, and citizen groups throughout the United States look at public opinion on capital punishment to support its continued use. In fact, strong public support is arguably the number one reason the death penalty continues to be used as a form of correctional policy in our criminal justice system. Bohm (2003) argues that public support for the death penalty contributes to its continued use in at least five ways. First, strong public support can sway legislators to vote in favor of the death penalty and against any statutes seeking its repeal. Second, he argues that prosecutors may seek the death penalty for political rather than legal purposes. Third, it may influence judges to impose death sentences or uphold death sentences on appeal. Fourth, governors may be less likely to veto death penalty legislation or commute a death sentence due to fear of risking re-election. Lastly, and what Bohm argues is the most important, is that supreme court justices (both state and federal) examine support for the death penalty as a measure of " evolving standards of decency " to decide whether the death penalty violates the U.S. Constitution's 8th Amendment " cruel and unusual punishment " clause.

American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013

ABSTRACT This study investigates the predictors of support for rehabilitation among 899 residents... more ABSTRACT This study investigates the predictors of support for rehabilitation among 899 residents of one county in Western New York. The results from the current study indicate that respondents strongly support rehabilitation as a goal of punishment. The findings show that sex and political ideology are important predictors of support with females and those holding a more liberal political ideology being more supportive of rehabilitation than males and conservatives. In addition, the study found support for the idea that one’s causal attributions towards crime influence their views toward punishment. Five of the causal attribution scales assessing support for different theoretical perspectives (strain/critical, social bond/attachment, deterrence, biological, and labeling) were found to significantly impact one’s overall support for rehabilitation.

Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 2012

This study investigates the predictors of punitiveness among 519 undergraduate college students a... more This study investigates the predictors of punitiveness among 519 undergraduate college students at one public university in the Northeast. Specifically, it compared levels of punitiveness among students majoring in criminology with students majoring in other academic disciplines. Due to the fact that criminology students may work as professionals within the criminal justice system after graduation, it is particularly important to

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2011

Malt liquor (ML) is a unique, high alcohol content beverage marketed to encourage heavy drinking.... more Malt liquor (ML) is a unique, high alcohol content beverage marketed to encourage heavy drinking. We developed the Malt Liquor Expectancy Questionnaire (MLEQ), a beverage-specific measure of alcohol expectancies and examined its association with ML use, total alcohol use and alcohol problems. Forty positive and 40 negative expectancy items were administered to a sample of 639 young adults who regularly consumed ML. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses led to the development of the 30-item MLEQ. The MLEQ consists of two positive (i.e., Social Facilitation and Enjoyment, Enhanced Sexuality) and two negative factors (i.e., Aggression and Negative Consequences; Impairment and Physical Symptoms) that possess good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The psychometrically sound MLEQ contributes to the limited research on beverage-specific expectancies and heavy drinking.

Addictive Behaviors, 2006

Young adult men and women (N = 53) who regularly consume malt liquor (i.e., 40 oz/week) participa... more Young adult men and women (N = 53) who regularly consume malt liquor (i.e., 40 oz/week) participated in 10 semi-structured focus groups. Group transcripts were analyzed using a multilevel process that focused on recurring themes across multiple groups. Commonly identified themes encompassed positive and negative qualities of malt liquor as well as contexts in which malt liquor was consumed. Some of the themes were corroborated by quantitative data on drinking behavior and other variables. The focus groups were designed to explore the unique characteristics of malt liquor (low price, high alcohol content, large volume packaging) that enhance consumption patterns and increase risk for excessive alcohol use. The combination of qualitative and quantitative data provides a unique and useful perspective for identifying issues for future research on malt liquor consumption. D

As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, it is of paramount import... more As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, it is of paramount importance to re-examine Justice Thurgood Marshall's hypotheses. In Justice Marshall's second hypothesis in his concurring opinion, he suggested "people who were fully informed' regarding the death penalty "would find the penalty, shocking, unjust and unacceptable" (p. 361). While there has been much empirical testing of this hypothesis, the intent of this study is to add to the existing literature by examining whether different methods of information delivery produce senti- ments in opposition to capital punishment. The main research question to be tested is as follows: does exposure to information have more of an impact on opinions if it is given in-person or in online/hybrid formats? Data were collected by an instructor who taught death penalty classes (n= 143) utilizing different teaching modalities. Results suggest that method of course delivery is mar- ginally significantly related to change in opposition towards capital punishment. More specifically, hybrid/online offerings were more likely to result in increased opposition towards the death penalty after taking the class. Furthermore, the analysis also revealed a significant relationship between teaching modality and level of death penalty knowledge at post-test. In light of recent developments in higher education resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is also beneficial to conduct research that has important implications as colleges and universities come to grips with a new normal in distance learning.

As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, the time is ripe for a re... more As we approach the 50-year anniversary of the landmark Furman decision, the time is ripe for a renewed empirical test of the hypotheses Justice Marshall presented in his concurring opinion. Most relevant to this study, he suggested in his second proposition that "people who were fully informed as to the purposes of the penalty and its liabilities would find the penalty, shocking, unjust and unacceptable." While there has been much empirical testing of this hypothesis, the intent of this study is to add to the existing literature by examining whether specific types of information about capital punishment is associated with opposition to capital punishment. Data were collected by an instructor who taught death penalty classes (n = 122 subjects) to test this hypothesis. Results provide qualified support for Marshall's second hypothesis that knowledge is significantly related to an increase in death penalty opposition. Moreover, the following factors were significant predictors of overall change in participants' opinion: cost, deterrence, race of victim, and evolving societies. Surprisingly, the innocence items did not appear statistically significant in altering opinions. Future research should

Dissertation Chair: Dr. Jamie S. Martin Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Kate Hanrahan, Dr. Jo... more Dissertation Chair: Dr. Jamie S. Martin Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Kate Hanrahan, Dr. John Lewis, and Dr. Jennifer Roberts

Strong public support for capital punishment is arguably the number one reason why the death pena... more Strong public support for capital punishment is arguably the number one reason why the death penalty continues to be used as a form of correctional policy in the U.S. criminal justice system. Therefore, it is fundamental that the measure of death penalty opinion be heavily scrutinized. Utilizing a methodological approach not typically employed in this area, the current study conducted six focus groups to gain a better understanding of the complexity of these opinions. During the focus groups, participants were asked to state their general beliefs concerning the death penalty, respond to scenarios, and respond to research findings regarding the death penalty (i.e., costs, deterrence, wrongful convictions, race, etc.). The findings suggest that participants' views regarding the death penalty are more multifaceted than previously believed. This study further suggests that current methods used to measure public support of the death penalty fail to capture the complexity of sentiment on this issue. Over the past few decades American correctional policy has focused on a " get tough " approach toward crime and punishment. In order to cast themselves as " tough on crime, " both Democrats and Republicans have continuously supported measures to increase the punishment allocated to criminal offenders. The most punitive type of punishment in the United States is arguably the death penalty. Unlike other types of punishments (such as prison or jail), the death penalty is the only punishment with a mobilized opposition that continues to fight against its use. Political leaders, criminal justice administrators, judges, and citizen groups throughout the United States look at public opinion on capital punishment to support its continued use. In fact, strong public support is arguably the number one reason the death penalty continues to be used as a form of correctional policy in our criminal justice system. Bohm (2003) argues that public support for the death penalty contributes to its continued use in at least five ways. First, strong public support can sway legislators to vote in favor of the death penalty and against any statutes seeking its repeal. Second, he argues that prosecutors may seek the death penalty for political rather than legal purposes. Third, it may influence judges to impose death sentences or uphold death sentences on appeal. Fourth, governors may be less likely to veto death penalty legislation or commute a death sentence due to fear of risking re-election. Lastly, and what Bohm argues is the most important, is that supreme court justices (both state and federal) examine support for the death penalty as a measure of " evolving standards of decency " to decide whether the death penalty violates the U.S. Constitution's 8th Amendment " cruel and unusual punishment " clause.

American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013

ABSTRACT This study investigates the predictors of support for rehabilitation among 899 residents... more ABSTRACT This study investigates the predictors of support for rehabilitation among 899 residents of one county in Western New York. The results from the current study indicate that respondents strongly support rehabilitation as a goal of punishment. The findings show that sex and political ideology are important predictors of support with females and those holding a more liberal political ideology being more supportive of rehabilitation than males and conservatives. In addition, the study found support for the idea that one’s causal attributions towards crime influence their views toward punishment. Five of the causal attribution scales assessing support for different theoretical perspectives (strain/critical, social bond/attachment, deterrence, biological, and labeling) were found to significantly impact one’s overall support for rehabilitation.

Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 2012

This study investigates the predictors of punitiveness among 519 undergraduate college students a... more This study investigates the predictors of punitiveness among 519 undergraduate college students at one public university in the Northeast. Specifically, it compared levels of punitiveness among students majoring in criminology with students majoring in other academic disciplines. Due to the fact that criminology students may work as professionals within the criminal justice system after graduation, it is particularly important to

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2011

Malt liquor (ML) is a unique, high alcohol content beverage marketed to encourage heavy drinking.... more Malt liquor (ML) is a unique, high alcohol content beverage marketed to encourage heavy drinking. We developed the Malt Liquor Expectancy Questionnaire (MLEQ), a beverage-specific measure of alcohol expectancies and examined its association with ML use, total alcohol use and alcohol problems. Forty positive and 40 negative expectancy items were administered to a sample of 639 young adults who regularly consumed ML. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses led to the development of the 30-item MLEQ. The MLEQ consists of two positive (i.e., Social Facilitation and Enjoyment, Enhanced Sexuality) and two negative factors (i.e., Aggression and Negative Consequences; Impairment and Physical Symptoms) that possess good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The psychometrically sound MLEQ contributes to the limited research on beverage-specific expectancies and heavy drinking.

Addictive Behaviors, 2006

Young adult men and women (N = 53) who regularly consume malt liquor (i.e., 40 oz/week) participa... more Young adult men and women (N = 53) who regularly consume malt liquor (i.e., 40 oz/week) participated in 10 semi-structured focus groups. Group transcripts were analyzed using a multilevel process that focused on recurring themes across multiple groups. Commonly identified themes encompassed positive and negative qualities of malt liquor as well as contexts in which malt liquor was consumed. Some of the themes were corroborated by quantitative data on drinking behavior and other variables. The focus groups were designed to explore the unique characteristics of malt liquor (low price, high alcohol content, large volume packaging) that enhance consumption patterns and increase risk for excessive alcohol use. The combination of qualitative and quantitative data provides a unique and useful perspective for identifying issues for future research on malt liquor consumption. D