Jari Eloranta | Appalachian State University (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Jari Eloranta
Hitherto I have set forth the nature of man, whose pride and other passions have compelled him to... more Hitherto I have set forth the nature of man, whose pride and other passions have compelled him to submit himself to government … But because he is mortal, and subject to decay, as all other earthly creatures are; and because there is that in heaven, though not on earth, that he should stand in fear of, and whose laws he ought to obey … Hobbes, 1651, Chapter XXVIII ABSTRACT Did the expansion of democratic institutions play a role in determining central government spending behavior in the 19th and 20th centuries? The link between democracy and increased central government spending is well established for the post-Second World War period, but has never been explored during the first " wave of democracy " and its subsequent
According to classic interpretations of the communist revolutions, political mobilization of peas... more According to classic interpretations of the communist revolutions, political mobilization of peasantry was critical for the success of the revolutionary forces. This article, which reexamines the experience of civil wars in Russia, Finland, Spain, and China, argues that peasants' contribution to the revolutions in Russia and later in China became possible under two historical conditions: breakdown of state authorities during the mass mobilization wars and existence of an unresolved agrarian problem in the countryside. Neither of these conditions alone, as the experience of other countries has shown, was sufficient for a success of the revolutionaries. The Spanish civil war of 1936–1939, for instance, was not preceded by a major international war. Because institutions of the traditional social order had not been undermined by war, Franco was able to defeat the Popular Front government, despite the peasants' support of the revolution. In the Finnish civil war of 1918, which broke out in the wake of World War I and the Russian Revolution, state institutions did not collapse completely and the peasantry was divided in their responses to the revolution; the rural smallholders, for example, aligned with the Mannerheim's White army, not with the urban revolutionaries.
Sociological Forum, 2014
ABSTRACT
Research in Economic History, 2014
The Journal of Economic History
Revue de l'OFCE, 2015
ABSTRACT
Sociological Forum, 2014
ABSTRACT
The Economics of Coercion and Conflict, 2014
Handbook of Cliometrics, 2014
Hitherto I have set forth the nature of man, whose pride and other passions have compelled him to... more Hitherto I have set forth the nature of man, whose pride and other passions have compelled him to submit himself to government … But because he is mortal, and subject to decay, as all other earthly creatures are; and because there is that in heaven, though not on earth, that he should stand in fear of, and whose laws he ought to obey … Hobbes, 1651, Chapter XXVIII ABSTRACT Did the expansion of democratic institutions play a role in determining central government spending behavior in the 19th and 20th centuries? The link between democracy and increased central government spending is well established for the post-Second World War period, but has never been explored during the first " wave of democracy " and its subsequent
According to classic interpretations of the communist revolutions, political mobilization of peas... more According to classic interpretations of the communist revolutions, political mobilization of peasantry was critical for the success of the revolutionary forces. This article, which reexamines the experience of civil wars in Russia, Finland, Spain, and China, argues that peasants' contribution to the revolutions in Russia and later in China became possible under two historical conditions: breakdown of state authorities during the mass mobilization wars and existence of an unresolved agrarian problem in the countryside. Neither of these conditions alone, as the experience of other countries has shown, was sufficient for a success of the revolutionaries. The Spanish civil war of 1936–1939, for instance, was not preceded by a major international war. Because institutions of the traditional social order had not been undermined by war, Franco was able to defeat the Popular Front government, despite the peasants' support of the revolution. In the Finnish civil war of 1918, which broke out in the wake of World War I and the Russian Revolution, state institutions did not collapse completely and the peasantry was divided in their responses to the revolution; the rural smallholders, for example, aligned with the Mannerheim's White army, not with the urban revolutionaries.
Sociological Forum, 2014
ABSTRACT
Research in Economic History, 2014
The Journal of Economic History
Revue de l'OFCE, 2015
ABSTRACT
Sociological Forum, 2014
ABSTRACT
The Economics of Coercion and Conflict, 2014
Handbook of Cliometrics, 2014