Cosmology and Convention (original) (raw)

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

arXiv:1703.02389v2 (physics)

[Submitted on 7 Mar 2017 (v1), last revised 11 Mar 2017 (this version, v2)]

Abstract:I argue that some important elements of the current cosmological model are "conventionalist" in the sense defined by Karl Popper. These elements include dark matter and dark energy; both are auxiliary hypotheses that were invoked in response to observations that falsified the standard model as it existed at the time. The use of conventionalist stratagems in response to unexpected observations implies that the field of cosmology is in a state of "degenerating problemshift" in the language of Imre Lakatos. I show that the "concordance" argument, often put forward by cosmologists in support of the current paradigm, is weaker than the convergence arguments that were made in the past in support of the atomic theory of matter or the quantization of energy.

Submission history

From: David Merritt [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:13:49 UTC (571 KB)
[v2] Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:55:08 UTC (848 KB)

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.