Regulatory Markets: The Future of AI Governance (original) (raw)
Abstract:Appropriately regulating artificial intelligence is an increasingly urgent and widespread policy challenge. We identify two primary, competing problem. First is a technical deficit: Legislatures and regulatory face significant challenges in rapidly translating conventional command-and-control legal requirements into technical requirements. Second is a democratic deficit: Over-reliance on industry to provide technical standards fails to ensure that the many values-based decisions that must be made to shape AI development and deployment are made by democratically accountable public, not private, actors. We propose a solution: regulatory markets, in which governments require the targets of regulation to purchase regulatory services from a government-licensed private regulator. This approach to AI regulation could overcome the limitations of both command-and-control regulation and excessive delegation to industry. Regulatory markets could enable governments to establish policy priorities for the regulation of AI while relying on market forces and industry R&D efforts to pioneer the technical methods of regulation that best achieve policymakers' stated objectives.
Submission history
From: Gillian Hadfield [view email]
[v1] Tue, 11 Apr 2023 01:05:55 UTC (1,422 KB)
[v2] Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:41:12 UTC (596 KB)
[v3] Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:25:50 UTC (1,470 KB)
[v4] Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:28:15 UTC (410 KB)
[v5] Tue, 3 Feb 2026 03:09:56 UTC (924 KB)