Elizabeth Oriel | Aarhus University (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by Elizabeth Oriel

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies ecocultural identities in human–elephant cohabitation

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “Persons”?

Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Sep 30, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “Persons”?

Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric par...

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as "Persons"? On Avoiding Anthropocentrism and Including Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how "being human" is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview-furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropoce...

Research paper thumbnail of Routledge handbook of ecocultural identity

Social & Cultural Geography, 2021

Ecocultural Identity is a book for our times. To enable identity with an ‘ecocultural’ framing is... more Ecocultural Identity is a book for our times. To enable identity with an ‘ecocultural’ framing is potent as we grapple with environmental problem-solving on a global scale.One of the first matters ...

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies ecocultural identities in human–elephant cohabitation

Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

Research paper thumbnail of Well-being as an effective assessment concept and tool for evaluation of harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) care practices in captivity and conservation in the wild

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “ Persons ” ? On Avoiding Anthropocentrism and Including Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric para...

Research paper thumbnail of Models of mutual thriving and collaborative co-habitation among human and non-human coastal species inform conservation, education and wellbeing

Conference on Compassionate Conservation, 2015

In certain coastal areas of the world, humans and non-human coastal systems and species including... more In certain coastal areas of the world, humans and non-human coastal systems and species including marine mammals, live within a general trend of thriving and even at times, mutually collaborative cohabitation. In these areas, awareness increases among fishermen, ferry and tour boat operators, leisure boaters, farmers and other human residents as to impacts of their activities on coastal habitats, with some pro-actively taking measures to protect marine life. In some regions, orcas and bottlenose dolphins regularly approach, initiate sociable contact, and engage in complex forms of interspecies interaction. Exploring such examples reveals the roots of a continuum of positive cohabitation, ranging from neutral, passive co-existence, to active sometimes mutual collaboration. Cohabitation research combines ecological, biological, and behavioral data as evidence of coastal system thriving, and interviews with human residents to understand relevant perceptions, attitudes, influences, and experiences. In this initial phase of research, we present preliminary comparisons between a relatively thriving area in the Hebrides, Scotland with the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, an area of marine ecological collapse. Inspired by the late Nobel Laureate Elinor Ostrom, who developed eight design principles for common pool resources through numerous cross-comparisons, we plan to uncover practical commonalities of positive cohabitation, allowing for variability in how each area thrives. These results can be applied, taught, promoted, and reinforced, as Ostrom’s have, through education, conservation, and government efforts towards protecting coastal communities. Ostrom’s Law states that “a resource arrangement that works in practice can work in theory”; cohabitation research learns from real relationships, which can guide the rich theoretical work on social & ecological systems, re-thinking the human/nature divide. Conservation efforts, justifiably, tend to focus on negative cohabitation, and yet positive cohabitation as a model to study and replicate is a neglected research area. Models of positive cohabitation inform conservation and wellbeing studies for humans and other species, as the ties that bind involve a unique dependence on mutual thriving.

Research paper thumbnail of What Three Social Science Theories Applied to Animals and Human-Animal Relations Reveal About Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Conservation.

International Congress of Conservation Biology, 2012

Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three const... more Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three constructs in the social sciences have recently been applied to this arena, making them relevant to consider in wildlife management practices. Research on animal language, cognition and abilities has facilitated applications of these theories or constructs. Social exchange theory, the capabilities approach, and post-traumatic stress disorder all arose originally from human-centered studies, but now apply to animals and human-animal relationships. Each of these theories has important insights, which may inform gray wolf (Canis lupus) conservation, especially when marred by human-wolf conflict. The first from Anthropology explains the reciprocality in human-animal relationships, the second from Philosophy and Economics recommends understanding wellbeing as the ability to express one’s capacities (both for humans and wolves), and the third from Psychology speaks to the injuries that result from violence or from witnessing injury or death. We will examine a particular case study of wolf conservation in the Yellowstone National Park area and draw both critique and strategies from these theories.

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies Ecocultural Identities in Human-Elephant Cohabitation

The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as "Persons": On the Avoidance of Anthropocentrism and the Inclusion of Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric paradigm, yet alternate eco-centric paradigms offer an inclusive model that may help dismantle the artificial wall between humans and nature. In this paper, I explore these eco-centric paradigms and the implications of an associated worldview for human perceptions, self-awareness, communication, narrative, and research.

Books by Elizabeth Oriel

Research paper thumbnail of Affective Ecologies and Multispecies Social Contracts Amidst Humans, Elephants, and a Landscape in Sri Lanka

Upcoming Book: Composing Worlds with Elephants: Interdisciplinary Dialogues

Research paper thumbnail of Dialogic Elephant and Human Relations in Sri Lanka as Social Practices of Cohabitation

Intimate Relations: Communicating (in) the Anthropocene, 2021

Research paper thumbnail of Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity Introduction, TOC, Endorsements

by Tema Milstein, José Castro-Sotomayor, Laura Bridgeman, David Abram, Melissa M Parks, Mariko O Thomas, Elizabeth Oriel, Toni Frohoff, Jeffrey Hoffmann, Casper G Bendixsen, Jessica Love-Nichols, Emma Frances Bloomfield, Charles Carlin, Eric Karikari, Godfried Asante, Dakota Raynes, Shilpa Dahake, Joe Quick, Gabriela Méndez Cota, Carrie Packwood Freeman, and Rebecca Banham

Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity (2020) is a timely book, as across the globe more ... more The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity (2020) is a timely book, as across the globe more and more of us awake to our always interconnected selves. The Handbook brings the ecological turn to sociocultural understandings of self and group identities, introducing an interdisciplinary, insightful assembly of original theory and research on planetary positionalities in flux in the Anthropocene – or what in this Handbook cultural ecologist David Abram presciently renames the Humilocene, a new “epoch of humility.” Forty international authors craft a kaleidoscopic lens, focusing on ways all identities are ecocultural and on the multiple and unspooling ways identities evolve and transform and, in so doing, may support reciprocal surviving and thriving.

Paperback out June 2022: 20% cost of hardback +20% off w/ code FLE22 ordering through Routledge.

Introduction chapter, table of contents, and endorsements are posted here. More, including editor bios and authors, can be found at this Routledge link: https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Ecocultural-Identity/Milstein-Castro-Sotomayor/p/book/9781138478411. Please help share the Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity among your networks. And please ask your libraries to purchase the book (or put it on their to-buy lists if budgets have been temporarily frozen due to Covid). The Handbook is an important resource for our times for scholars, teachers, students, protectors, policy-makers, and practitioners. The editors, Tema Milstein and José Castro-Sotomayor, are available for Q&A, interviews, guest commentary, talks, etc. Thanks for your interest and for helping to spread word!

What has been said about the Handbook:
“Intricately transdisciplinary and cross-geographical, it is the first volume of its kind to caringly craft a gathering concept, that of ecocultural identities, bringing together the social, political, and ecological dimensions of identity. What results is a treasure of insights on the politics of life, broadly speaking, and a novel toolbox for tackling effectively the damages caused by modern capitalist modes of extraction and the urgent task of Earth’s ontological repair and renewal.”
Arturo Escobar, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

“Too often mislabelled an ‘issue,’ the environment is in fact integral not just to everything we do but to who we are. This link between our identity and our ecology has long been recognised in many societies, but others seem to have forgotten its signal importance. This superb collection shows why all identities are ecocultural ones, and why full recognition of this is essential to all our political futures.”
Noel Castree, University of Manchester

“A smart, provocative, and original collection, the Handbook of Ecocultural Identity provides a definitive introduction to the constraints upon, and the contexts, formations, and impacts of, our diverse – but often unexamined – ecological selves.”
Robert Cox, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and three-time national president of the Sierra Club

“I am in complete solidarity with this book.”
Donna Haraway, University of California, Santa Cruz

Conference Presentations by Elizabeth Oriel

Research paper thumbnail of What Three Social Science Theories Applied to Animals and Human-Animal Relations Reveal About Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Conservation

Paper Presented at the International Congress for Conservation Biology, Baltimore, MD, 2013

Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three const... more Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three constructs in the social sciences have recently been applied to this arena, making them relevant to consider in wildlife management practices. Research on animal language, cognition, and abilities has facilitated applications of these theories or constructs. Social exchange theory, the capabilities approach, and post-traumatic stress disorder all arose originally from human-centered studies but now apply to animals and human-animal relationships. Each of these theories has important insights, which may inform gray wolf (Canis lupus) conservation, especially when marred by human-wolf conflict. The first from Anthropology explains the reciprocality in human-animal relationships, the second from Philosophy and Economics recommends understanding wellbeing as the ability to express one’s capacities (both for humans and wolves), and the third from Psychology speaks to the injuries that result from violence or from witnessing injury or death. We will examine a particular case study of wolf conservation in the Yellowstone National Park area and draw both critique and strategies from these theories.

Research paper thumbnail of Integrating the Concept of Well-Being into Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina) Conservation and Captive Care

Poster presented at the International Congress for Conservation Biology, Edmonton, Alberta , 2010

Historically, conservation focuses on the scale of populations and species. However, there has be... more Historically, conservation focuses on the scale of populations and species. However, there has been a growing awareness of the social and ecological key roles that individuals play. Further, concerns for animal welfare bring ethical attention. It is therefore no longer ethically nor practically cogent to ignore factors such as individual well-being in conservation design and monitoring. Drawing from a literature review and interviews with seal researchers, rehabilitation care-givers, and a veterinarian, we introduce and discuss well-being as a core concept for the conservation of harbor seals. We use a working definition of well-being as "integrity of form, function, the ability to strive and utilize one's abilities" as a backdrop to this synthesis of the natural behavioral repertoire and characteristics of harbor seals. This definition can aid in decisions that concern coastal and oceanic environmental policy, laws that govern how humans treat marine mammals in captivity, rehabilitation, and in the wild, and in any actions that impact harbor seal individuals and colonies.

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies ecocultural identities in human–elephant cohabitation

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “Persons”?

Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Sep 30, 2014

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “Persons”?

Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric par...

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as "Persons"? On Avoiding Anthropocentrism and Including Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how "being human" is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview-furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropoce...

Research paper thumbnail of Routledge handbook of ecocultural identity

Social & Cultural Geography, 2021

Ecocultural Identity is a book for our times. To enable identity with an ‘ecocultural’ framing is... more Ecocultural Identity is a book for our times. To enable identity with an ‘ecocultural’ framing is potent as we grapple with environmental problem-solving on a global scale.One of the first matters ...

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies ecocultural identities in human–elephant cohabitation

Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

Research paper thumbnail of Well-being as an effective assessment concept and tool for evaluation of harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) care practices in captivity and conservation in the wild

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as “ Persons ” ? On Avoiding Anthropocentrism and Including Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric para...

Research paper thumbnail of Models of mutual thriving and collaborative co-habitation among human and non-human coastal species inform conservation, education and wellbeing

Conference on Compassionate Conservation, 2015

In certain coastal areas of the world, humans and non-human coastal systems and species including... more In certain coastal areas of the world, humans and non-human coastal systems and species including marine mammals, live within a general trend of thriving and even at times, mutually collaborative cohabitation. In these areas, awareness increases among fishermen, ferry and tour boat operators, leisure boaters, farmers and other human residents as to impacts of their activities on coastal habitats, with some pro-actively taking measures to protect marine life. In some regions, orcas and bottlenose dolphins regularly approach, initiate sociable contact, and engage in complex forms of interspecies interaction. Exploring such examples reveals the roots of a continuum of positive cohabitation, ranging from neutral, passive co-existence, to active sometimes mutual collaboration. Cohabitation research combines ecological, biological, and behavioral data as evidence of coastal system thriving, and interviews with human residents to understand relevant perceptions, attitudes, influences, and experiences. In this initial phase of research, we present preliminary comparisons between a relatively thriving area in the Hebrides, Scotland with the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, an area of marine ecological collapse. Inspired by the late Nobel Laureate Elinor Ostrom, who developed eight design principles for common pool resources through numerous cross-comparisons, we plan to uncover practical commonalities of positive cohabitation, allowing for variability in how each area thrives. These results can be applied, taught, promoted, and reinforced, as Ostrom’s have, through education, conservation, and government efforts towards protecting coastal communities. Ostrom’s Law states that “a resource arrangement that works in practice can work in theory”; cohabitation research learns from real relationships, which can guide the rich theoretical work on social & ecological systems, re-thinking the human/nature divide. Conservation efforts, justifiably, tend to focus on negative cohabitation, and yet positive cohabitation as a model to study and replicate is a neglected research area. Models of positive cohabitation inform conservation and wellbeing studies for humans and other species, as the ties that bind involve a unique dependence on mutual thriving.

Research paper thumbnail of What Three Social Science Theories Applied to Animals and Human-Animal Relations Reveal About Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Conservation.

International Congress of Conservation Biology, 2012

Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three const... more Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three constructs in the social sciences have recently been applied to this arena, making them relevant to consider in wildlife management practices. Research on animal language, cognition and abilities has facilitated applications of these theories or constructs. Social exchange theory, the capabilities approach, and post-traumatic stress disorder all arose originally from human-centered studies, but now apply to animals and human-animal relationships. Each of these theories has important insights, which may inform gray wolf (Canis lupus) conservation, especially when marred by human-wolf conflict. The first from Anthropology explains the reciprocality in human-animal relationships, the second from Philosophy and Economics recommends understanding wellbeing as the ability to express one’s capacities (both for humans and wolves), and the third from Psychology speaks to the injuries that result from violence or from witnessing injury or death. We will examine a particular case study of wolf conservation in the Yellowstone National Park area and draw both critique and strategies from these theories.

Research paper thumbnail of Conversing with Dolphins: The Holy Grail of Interspecies Communication?

Research paper thumbnail of Interspecies Ecocultural Identities in Human-Elephant Cohabitation

The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

Research paper thumbnail of Whom Would Animals Designate as "Persons": On the Avoidance of Anthropocentrism and the Inclusion of Others

Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending t... more Humans are animals; humans are machines. The current academic and popular dialogue on extending the personhood boundary to certain non-human animal species and at the same time to machines/robots reflects a dialectic about how “being human” is defined, about how we perceive our species and ourselves in relation to the environment. While both paths have the potential to improve lives, these improvements differ in substance and in consequence. One route has the potential to broaden the anthropocentric focus within the West and honor interdependence with life systems, while the other affords greater currency to a human-purpose-driven worldview–furthering an unchecked Anthropocene. The broadening of legal personhood rights to life systems is underway with a ruling for dolphins in India, for a river in New Zealand and with Laws of the Rights of Mother Earth in Bolivia. Many philosophers, ethicists, and ethologists define personhood within the confines of the dominant anthropocentric paradigm, yet alternate eco-centric paradigms offer an inclusive model that may help dismantle the artificial wall between humans and nature. In this paper, I explore these eco-centric paradigms and the implications of an associated worldview for human perceptions, self-awareness, communication, narrative, and research.

Research paper thumbnail of Affective Ecologies and Multispecies Social Contracts Amidst Humans, Elephants, and a Landscape in Sri Lanka

Upcoming Book: Composing Worlds with Elephants: Interdisciplinary Dialogues

Research paper thumbnail of Dialogic Elephant and Human Relations in Sri Lanka as Social Practices of Cohabitation

Intimate Relations: Communicating (in) the Anthropocene, 2021

Research paper thumbnail of Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity Introduction, TOC, Endorsements

by Tema Milstein, José Castro-Sotomayor, Laura Bridgeman, David Abram, Melissa M Parks, Mariko O Thomas, Elizabeth Oriel, Toni Frohoff, Jeffrey Hoffmann, Casper G Bendixsen, Jessica Love-Nichols, Emma Frances Bloomfield, Charles Carlin, Eric Karikari, Godfried Asante, Dakota Raynes, Shilpa Dahake, Joe Quick, Gabriela Méndez Cota, Carrie Packwood Freeman, and Rebecca Banham

Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, 2020

The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity (2020) is a timely book, as across the globe more ... more The Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity (2020) is a timely book, as across the globe more and more of us awake to our always interconnected selves. The Handbook brings the ecological turn to sociocultural understandings of self and group identities, introducing an interdisciplinary, insightful assembly of original theory and research on planetary positionalities in flux in the Anthropocene – or what in this Handbook cultural ecologist David Abram presciently renames the Humilocene, a new “epoch of humility.” Forty international authors craft a kaleidoscopic lens, focusing on ways all identities are ecocultural and on the multiple and unspooling ways identities evolve and transform and, in so doing, may support reciprocal surviving and thriving.

Paperback out June 2022: 20% cost of hardback +20% off w/ code FLE22 ordering through Routledge.

Introduction chapter, table of contents, and endorsements are posted here. More, including editor bios and authors, can be found at this Routledge link: https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Ecocultural-Identity/Milstein-Castro-Sotomayor/p/book/9781138478411. Please help share the Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity among your networks. And please ask your libraries to purchase the book (or put it on their to-buy lists if budgets have been temporarily frozen due to Covid). The Handbook is an important resource for our times for scholars, teachers, students, protectors, policy-makers, and practitioners. The editors, Tema Milstein and José Castro-Sotomayor, are available for Q&A, interviews, guest commentary, talks, etc. Thanks for your interest and for helping to spread word!

What has been said about the Handbook:
“Intricately transdisciplinary and cross-geographical, it is the first volume of its kind to caringly craft a gathering concept, that of ecocultural identities, bringing together the social, political, and ecological dimensions of identity. What results is a treasure of insights on the politics of life, broadly speaking, and a novel toolbox for tackling effectively the damages caused by modern capitalist modes of extraction and the urgent task of Earth’s ontological repair and renewal.”
Arturo Escobar, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

“Too often mislabelled an ‘issue,’ the environment is in fact integral not just to everything we do but to who we are. This link between our identity and our ecology has long been recognised in many societies, but others seem to have forgotten its signal importance. This superb collection shows why all identities are ecocultural ones, and why full recognition of this is essential to all our political futures.”
Noel Castree, University of Manchester

“A smart, provocative, and original collection, the Handbook of Ecocultural Identity provides a definitive introduction to the constraints upon, and the contexts, formations, and impacts of, our diverse – but often unexamined – ecological selves.”
Robert Cox, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and three-time national president of the Sierra Club

“I am in complete solidarity with this book.”
Donna Haraway, University of California, Santa Cruz

Research paper thumbnail of What Three Social Science Theories Applied to Animals and Human-Animal Relations Reveal About Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Conservation

Paper Presented at the International Congress for Conservation Biology, Baltimore, MD, 2013

Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three const... more Wildlife management falls into the rapidly advancing field of human-animal relations. Three constructs in the social sciences have recently been applied to this arena, making them relevant to consider in wildlife management practices. Research on animal language, cognition, and abilities has facilitated applications of these theories or constructs. Social exchange theory, the capabilities approach, and post-traumatic stress disorder all arose originally from human-centered studies but now apply to animals and human-animal relationships. Each of these theories has important insights, which may inform gray wolf (Canis lupus) conservation, especially when marred by human-wolf conflict. The first from Anthropology explains the reciprocality in human-animal relationships, the second from Philosophy and Economics recommends understanding wellbeing as the ability to express one’s capacities (both for humans and wolves), and the third from Psychology speaks to the injuries that result from violence or from witnessing injury or death. We will examine a particular case study of wolf conservation in the Yellowstone National Park area and draw both critique and strategies from these theories.

Research paper thumbnail of Integrating the Concept of Well-Being into Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina) Conservation and Captive Care

Poster presented at the International Congress for Conservation Biology, Edmonton, Alberta , 2010

Historically, conservation focuses on the scale of populations and species. However, there has be... more Historically, conservation focuses on the scale of populations and species. However, there has been a growing awareness of the social and ecological key roles that individuals play. Further, concerns for animal welfare bring ethical attention. It is therefore no longer ethically nor practically cogent to ignore factors such as individual well-being in conservation design and monitoring. Drawing from a literature review and interviews with seal researchers, rehabilitation care-givers, and a veterinarian, we introduce and discuss well-being as a core concept for the conservation of harbor seals. We use a working definition of well-being as "integrity of form, function, the ability to strive and utilize one's abilities" as a backdrop to this synthesis of the natural behavioral repertoire and characteristics of harbor seals. This definition can aid in decisions that concern coastal and oceanic environmental policy, laws that govern how humans treat marine mammals in captivity, rehabilitation, and in the wild, and in any actions that impact harbor seal individuals and colonies.