Hillay Zmora | Ben Gurion University of the Negev (original) (raw)

Hillay Zmora

Uploads

Books by Hillay Zmora

Research paper thumbnail of Erika Graham-Goering, Jim van der Meulen & Frederik Buylaert (eds.), Lordship and the Decentralised State in Late Medieval Europe (Proceedings of the British Academy, 268) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025)

Research paper thumbnail of The World of Machiavelli (in Hebrew)

The World of Machiavelli explores his teaching by placing it squarely in its political and intell... more The World of Machiavelli explores his teaching by placing it squarely in its political and intellectual context. Based on a wide range of personal letters, diplomatic dispatches and administrative memoranda as well as on his treatises, plays and poems, it traces the development of his skills, mental habits and unique views from his youth, through his turbulent public career, to his last days. Alongside the formative historical and personal circumstances, the book explores the universal dimensions of Machiavelli’s thought, which forms an integral part of an ongoing conversation about our ability to organize our shared lives and shape our destiny. Thus, The World of Machiavelli differs from most biographies and studies of his thought: focusing on a cluster of themes that are central both in his works and in our modern public life, the book invites the readers to reflect on major issues of our time by engaging with Machiavelli.

Research paper thumbnail of The Feud in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)

The practice of feuding amongst noblemen and princes represented a substantial threat to law and ... more The practice of feuding amongst noblemen and princes represented a substantial threat to law and order, yet it was widely accepted and deeply embedded in late medieval and early modern German society. Hillay Zmora offers a new interpretation of this violent social practice, which has long confounded historians and social scientists. His groundbreaking study explains feud violence in its social context, demonstrating that, paradoxically, nobles feuded mostly not against strangers but with neighbours, relatives and their feudal lords. Focusing on the ambivalent relationships and symbolic communication between nobles, this study explores how values, norms and moral sentiments linked to reciprocity provided the most powerful incentives to engage in violent conflict. It will be essential reading for historians, anthropologists, psychologists and anyone who seeks to understand the link between culture, moral systems and endemic violence.

Research paper thumbnail of Monarchy, Aristocracy and The State in Europe 1300-1800 (London: Routledge, 2001).

Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300 - 1800 is an important survey of the relations... more Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300 - 1800 is an important survey of the relationship between monarchy and state in early modern European history. Spanning five centuries and covering England, France, Spain, Germany and Austria, this book considers the key themes in the formation of the modern state in Europe.
The relationship of the nobility with the state is the key to understanding the development of modern government in Europe. In order to understand the way modern states were formed, this book focusses on the implications of the incessant and costly wars which European governments waged against each other, which indeed propelled the modern state into being.
Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300-1800 takes a fascinating thematic approach, providing a useful survey of the position and role of the nobility in the government of states in early modern Europe.

Research paper thumbnail of State and Nobility in Early Modern Germany: The Knightly Feud in Franconia 1440-1567 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

One of the most striking features of late medieval and early modern German was the countless feud... more One of the most striking features of late medieval and early modern German was the countless feuds carried out by nobles. A constant threat to law and order, these feuds have commonly been regarded as a manifestation of the decline - economic and otherwise - of the nobility. This study shows that the nobility was not in crisis at this time. Nor were feuds merely banditry by another name. Rather, they were the result of an interplay between two fundamental processes: princely state-building, and social stratification among the nobility. Offering a new paradigm for understanding the German nobility, this book argues that the development of the state made proximity to princes the single most decisive factor in determining the fortune of a family. The result was a violent competition among the nobility over resources which were crucial to the princes. Feuds played a central role in this struggle that eventually led to the formation of an elite of noble families on whose power and wealth the princely state depended.

Edited books by Hillay Zmora

Research paper thumbnail of Niccolo Machiavelli, Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio. An annotated Hebrew edition (Jerusalem: Shalem Press, 2010).

Research paper thumbnail of Niccolo Machiavelli, Il Principe. An annotated Hebrew edition (Tel Aviv and Jerusalem: Dvir and Shalem Press, 2003).

Papers by Hillay Zmora

Research paper thumbnail of Reputation as a common source of cooperation and violent conflict: The case of the noble feud in early modern Germany

Evolution and Human Behavior, 2020

Feuding was a near-universal phenomenon, and a classic topic of anthropology and sociology. This ... more Feuding was a near-universal phenomenon, and a classic topic of anthropology and sociology. This article focuses on feuding among nobles in early modern Germany. The German noble feud assumed characteristics that differentiated it from vendetta. It developed into a distinct institution in terms of its legal status, methods and social conditions. It presents a puzzle: most feuds punctuated ongoing relationships between people who were closely related and socially and economically interdependent. Nobles tended to feud against the very people from whose goodwill they had much to gain and from whose enmity much to lose. Examining it from an evolutionary perspective suggests an answer to a problem that traditional historical approaches have not convincingly explained. The article argues that the same dense web of ties that facilitated cooperation between nobles generated violent conflicts between them. Reputation played a crucial role in this environment. Feuds are best seen as mechanisms of costly signaling one's underlying qualities and commitment to aristocratic values.

Research paper thumbnail of "Experience and Ideology: The Problem of Machiavelli's Realism," Il Pensiero Politico 50, no. 3 (2017), 307-331.

Research paper thumbnail of “Schmalkaldic War”, in War and Religion: Enyclopedia of Faith and Conflict, ed. Jeffrey M. Shaw and Timothy J. Demy, 3 vols. (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2017), iii, 714-716.

Research paper thumbnail of "Das Verhältnis Markgraf Albrechts zum fränkischen Adel," in Albrecht Achilles: Burggraf von Nürnberg – Kurfürst von Brandenburg, ed. Mario Müller (Jahrbuch des Historischen Vereins für Mittelfranken 102) (Ansbach, 2014), 235-248.

Research paper thumbnail of "Social Conflict in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Psychological and Social Aspects," in Faces of Communities: Social Ties between Loyalty, Trust and Friendship, ed. S. Feickert et al. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2014), 175-191.

Research paper thumbnail of "Nam und Stamm": Adel, Fortpflanzungsefrolg und Zunahme der Fehden am Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts, in: Fehdeführung im spätmittelalterlichen Reich: Zwischen adliger Handlungslogik und territorialer Verdichtung, ed. Julia Eulenstein, Christine Reinle, Michael Rothmann (Affalterbach, 2013), 285-301.

Research paper thumbnail of "Ruf, Vertrauen, Kommunikation: Fehde und adlige Identität in Franken im Spätmittelalter," in Kommunikationsnetze des Ritteradels im Reich um 1500, ed. Joachim Schneider (Geschichtliche Landeskunde, vol. 69) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2012), 147-160.

Research paper thumbnail of "The Formation of the Imperial Knighthood in Franconia: A Comparative  European Perspective," in The Holy Roman Empire, 1495-1806, ed. Robert Evans, Michael Schaich, Peter Wilson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 283-302.

Research paper thumbnail of The Formation of the Imperial Knighthood in Franconia: A Comparative European Perspective

Research paper thumbnail of "Nemici intimi: autorità principesche, faide nobiliari e condizioni della pace nella Germania del tardo medioevo," in Stringere la pace: Teorie e pratiche della conciliazione nell’Europa moderna (secoli XV-XVIII), ed. Paolo Broggio e Maria Pia Paoli (Rome: Viella, 2011), 309-331.

Research paper thumbnail of "Feuds for and against Princes: Politics, Violence, and Aristocratic Identity," in What Makes the Nobility Noble? Comparative Perspectives from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Jörn Leonhard and Christian Wieland (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2011), 121-141.

Research paper thumbnail of "De strijd om de vete in het Heilige Roomse Rijk: recent onderzoek en nieuwe interpretaties," Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 123, no. 2 (2010), 178-191.

Research paper thumbnail of "A World without a Saving Grace: Glory and Immortality in Machiavelli," History of Political Thought 28, no. 3 (2007), 449-468.

Glory in Machiavelli is an ultimate value. Despite its conceptual centrality, his notion of glory... more Glory in Machiavelli is an ultimate value. Despite its conceptual centrality, his notion of glory has received relatively little scholarly attention. This article seeks to go beyond the common interpretation that Machiavelli conceived of glory as a means to harmonize man's inexorable selfish ambition with the public interest. It addresses the theoretically prior question of why Machiavelli expected that the uncertain hopes for glory would prevail over more immediate human appetites and thus serve the construction of a good political order. The article argues that Machiavelli presented the human world as miserable yet simultaneously denied mankind any outlet by systematically severing the threads with which men sought to connect to eternity. Foreclosing in particular the Christian promise of afterlife , Machiavelli impresses upon the capable few the only path (he leaves open) towards transcending a degraded world: the path to immortal glory. The human condition thus serves as the basis for dealing with the fundamental political problem.

Research paper thumbnail of Erika Graham-Goering, Jim van der Meulen & Frederik Buylaert (eds.), Lordship and the Decentralised State in Late Medieval Europe (Proceedings of the British Academy, 268) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025)

Research paper thumbnail of The World of Machiavelli (in Hebrew)

The World of Machiavelli explores his teaching by placing it squarely in its political and intell... more The World of Machiavelli explores his teaching by placing it squarely in its political and intellectual context. Based on a wide range of personal letters, diplomatic dispatches and administrative memoranda as well as on his treatises, plays and poems, it traces the development of his skills, mental habits and unique views from his youth, through his turbulent public career, to his last days. Alongside the formative historical and personal circumstances, the book explores the universal dimensions of Machiavelli’s thought, which forms an integral part of an ongoing conversation about our ability to organize our shared lives and shape our destiny. Thus, The World of Machiavelli differs from most biographies and studies of his thought: focusing on a cluster of themes that are central both in his works and in our modern public life, the book invites the readers to reflect on major issues of our time by engaging with Machiavelli.

Research paper thumbnail of The Feud in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)

The practice of feuding amongst noblemen and princes represented a substantial threat to law and ... more The practice of feuding amongst noblemen and princes represented a substantial threat to law and order, yet it was widely accepted and deeply embedded in late medieval and early modern German society. Hillay Zmora offers a new interpretation of this violent social practice, which has long confounded historians and social scientists. His groundbreaking study explains feud violence in its social context, demonstrating that, paradoxically, nobles feuded mostly not against strangers but with neighbours, relatives and their feudal lords. Focusing on the ambivalent relationships and symbolic communication between nobles, this study explores how values, norms and moral sentiments linked to reciprocity provided the most powerful incentives to engage in violent conflict. It will be essential reading for historians, anthropologists, psychologists and anyone who seeks to understand the link between culture, moral systems and endemic violence.

Research paper thumbnail of Monarchy, Aristocracy and The State in Europe 1300-1800 (London: Routledge, 2001).

Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300 - 1800 is an important survey of the relations... more Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300 - 1800 is an important survey of the relationship between monarchy and state in early modern European history. Spanning five centuries and covering England, France, Spain, Germany and Austria, this book considers the key themes in the formation of the modern state in Europe.
The relationship of the nobility with the state is the key to understanding the development of modern government in Europe. In order to understand the way modern states were formed, this book focusses on the implications of the incessant and costly wars which European governments waged against each other, which indeed propelled the modern state into being.
Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300-1800 takes a fascinating thematic approach, providing a useful survey of the position and role of the nobility in the government of states in early modern Europe.

Research paper thumbnail of State and Nobility in Early Modern Germany: The Knightly Feud in Franconia 1440-1567 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

One of the most striking features of late medieval and early modern German was the countless feud... more One of the most striking features of late medieval and early modern German was the countless feuds carried out by nobles. A constant threat to law and order, these feuds have commonly been regarded as a manifestation of the decline - economic and otherwise - of the nobility. This study shows that the nobility was not in crisis at this time. Nor were feuds merely banditry by another name. Rather, they were the result of an interplay between two fundamental processes: princely state-building, and social stratification among the nobility. Offering a new paradigm for understanding the German nobility, this book argues that the development of the state made proximity to princes the single most decisive factor in determining the fortune of a family. The result was a violent competition among the nobility over resources which were crucial to the princes. Feuds played a central role in this struggle that eventually led to the formation of an elite of noble families on whose power and wealth the princely state depended.

Research paper thumbnail of Niccolo Machiavelli, Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio. An annotated Hebrew edition (Jerusalem: Shalem Press, 2010).

Research paper thumbnail of Niccolo Machiavelli, Il Principe. An annotated Hebrew edition (Tel Aviv and Jerusalem: Dvir and Shalem Press, 2003).

Research paper thumbnail of Reputation as a common source of cooperation and violent conflict: The case of the noble feud in early modern Germany

Evolution and Human Behavior, 2020

Feuding was a near-universal phenomenon, and a classic topic of anthropology and sociology. This ... more Feuding was a near-universal phenomenon, and a classic topic of anthropology and sociology. This article focuses on feuding among nobles in early modern Germany. The German noble feud assumed characteristics that differentiated it from vendetta. It developed into a distinct institution in terms of its legal status, methods and social conditions. It presents a puzzle: most feuds punctuated ongoing relationships between people who were closely related and socially and economically interdependent. Nobles tended to feud against the very people from whose goodwill they had much to gain and from whose enmity much to lose. Examining it from an evolutionary perspective suggests an answer to a problem that traditional historical approaches have not convincingly explained. The article argues that the same dense web of ties that facilitated cooperation between nobles generated violent conflicts between them. Reputation played a crucial role in this environment. Feuds are best seen as mechanisms of costly signaling one's underlying qualities and commitment to aristocratic values.

Research paper thumbnail of "Experience and Ideology: The Problem of Machiavelli's Realism," Il Pensiero Politico 50, no. 3 (2017), 307-331.

Research paper thumbnail of “Schmalkaldic War”, in War and Religion: Enyclopedia of Faith and Conflict, ed. Jeffrey M. Shaw and Timothy J. Demy, 3 vols. (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2017), iii, 714-716.

Research paper thumbnail of "Das Verhältnis Markgraf Albrechts zum fränkischen Adel," in Albrecht Achilles: Burggraf von Nürnberg – Kurfürst von Brandenburg, ed. Mario Müller (Jahrbuch des Historischen Vereins für Mittelfranken 102) (Ansbach, 2014), 235-248.

Research paper thumbnail of "Social Conflict in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Psychological and Social Aspects," in Faces of Communities: Social Ties between Loyalty, Trust and Friendship, ed. S. Feickert et al. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2014), 175-191.

Research paper thumbnail of "Nam und Stamm": Adel, Fortpflanzungsefrolg und Zunahme der Fehden am Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts, in: Fehdeführung im spätmittelalterlichen Reich: Zwischen adliger Handlungslogik und territorialer Verdichtung, ed. Julia Eulenstein, Christine Reinle, Michael Rothmann (Affalterbach, 2013), 285-301.

Research paper thumbnail of "Ruf, Vertrauen, Kommunikation: Fehde und adlige Identität in Franken im Spätmittelalter," in Kommunikationsnetze des Ritteradels im Reich um 1500, ed. Joachim Schneider (Geschichtliche Landeskunde, vol. 69) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2012), 147-160.

Research paper thumbnail of "The Formation of the Imperial Knighthood in Franconia: A Comparative  European Perspective," in The Holy Roman Empire, 1495-1806, ed. Robert Evans, Michael Schaich, Peter Wilson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 283-302.

Research paper thumbnail of The Formation of the Imperial Knighthood in Franconia: A Comparative European Perspective

Research paper thumbnail of "Nemici intimi: autorità principesche, faide nobiliari e condizioni della pace nella Germania del tardo medioevo," in Stringere la pace: Teorie e pratiche della conciliazione nell’Europa moderna (secoli XV-XVIII), ed. Paolo Broggio e Maria Pia Paoli (Rome: Viella, 2011), 309-331.

Research paper thumbnail of "Feuds for and against Princes: Politics, Violence, and Aristocratic Identity," in What Makes the Nobility Noble? Comparative Perspectives from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Jörn Leonhard and Christian Wieland (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2011), 121-141.

Research paper thumbnail of "De strijd om de vete in het Heilige Roomse Rijk: recent onderzoek en nieuwe interpretaties," Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 123, no. 2 (2010), 178-191.

Research paper thumbnail of "A World without a Saving Grace: Glory and Immortality in Machiavelli," History of Political Thought 28, no. 3 (2007), 449-468.

Glory in Machiavelli is an ultimate value. Despite its conceptual centrality, his notion of glory... more Glory in Machiavelli is an ultimate value. Despite its conceptual centrality, his notion of glory has received relatively little scholarly attention. This article seeks to go beyond the common interpretation that Machiavelli conceived of glory as a means to harmonize man's inexorable selfish ambition with the public interest. It addresses the theoretically prior question of why Machiavelli expected that the uncertain hopes for glory would prevail over more immediate human appetites and thus serve the construction of a good political order. The article argues that Machiavelli presented the human world as miserable yet simultaneously denied mankind any outlet by systematically severing the threads with which men sought to connect to eternity. Foreclosing in particular the Christian promise of afterlife , Machiavelli impresses upon the capable few the only path (he leaves open) towards transcending a degraded world: the path to immortal glory. The human condition thus serves as the basis for dealing with the fundamental political problem.

Research paper thumbnail of "Values and Violence: The Morals of Feuding in Late Medieval Germany, in Feud in Medieval and Early Modern Europe," ed. Jeppe Büchert Netterstrøm and Bjørn Poulsen (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2007), 147-160.

Research paper thumbnail of "Das aristokratische Moment in Ansbach-Kulmbach: Fürsten und Adelige auf dem Weg ins Jahr 1515," in Wirtschaft – Gesellschaft – Mentalitäten im Mittelalter: Festschrift zum 75. Geburtstag von Rolf Sprandel, ed. Hans-Peter Baum, Rainer Leng, Joachim Schneider (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2006), 361-79.

Research paper thumbnail of "The Princely State and the Noble Family: Conflict and Co-operation in the Margraviates Ansbach-Kulmbach in the Fifteetnth and Sixteenth Century,"  The Historical Journal 49, no. 1 (2006), 1-21.

Research paper thumbnail of "Love of Country and Love of Party: Patriotism and Human Nature in Machiavelli," History of Political Thought 25, no. 3 (2004), 424-445.

Machiavelli put a premium on patriotism. But the notion of love of country, with the altruism and... more Machiavelli put a premium on patriotism. But the notion of love of country, with the altruism and self-sacrifice it presupposes, is at first glance irreconcilable with the inexorable anthropological pessimism that informs his political theory. Was Machiavelli egregiously inconsistent? The question has a fundamental bearing on his political teaching. Examining Machiavelli's concepts of human nature and patriotism within his overall view of politics, society and history, this paper argues that he conceived of patriotism primarily in terms of readiness to self-restraint rather than readiness to self-sacrifice. Patriotism in Machiavelli is a force passive and limited enough to conform with human nature. By the same token, patriotism thrives in a political unit when the selfish passions that thwart it are satisfied, and they are best satisfied at the expense of other political units. Thus, patriotism in Machiavelli partakes of wicked human nature. But precisely for this reason it can offset some of human nature's destructive elements and help men to attain social ends. Machiavelli's patriotism, in the end, offers a redemption of sorts.

Research paper thumbnail of "Princely State-Making and the ‘Crisis of the Aristocracy’ in Late Medieval Germany," Past and Present 153 (1996), 37-63.

Research paper thumbnail of "Adelige Ehre und ritterliche Fehde: Franken im Spätmittelalter," in Verletzte Ehre: Ehrkonflikte in Gesellschaften des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Klaus Schreiner and Gerd Schwerhoff (Cologne: Böhlau, 1995), 92-109.

Log In