Bible Drill Team (original) (raw)
Bible Drill Team [Most Recent Entries][Calendar View] [Friends]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded inbibledrillteam's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
Friday, July 14th, 2006 | |
---|---|
_12:00 am_[nerdy4me] | Just a Thought You might want to check this out if you get a chance. It is a great site. Hope everyone is having a good summer. God Bless (Comment on this) |
Thursday, May 5th, 2005 | |
_11:11 pm_[maydayflower] | Let's face it: as hearty Christians, we try to stay on stop of the latest findings and facts in the world so that we can weed out all the sinners from the righteous ones (us). Specifically, in the 1980's when the truth of the homosexual agenda was shown to ALL--not only us saved-ones--we used this information to our advantage. The light was shown to us through the power of God, and through the gift of AIDS! Even such intelligent presidents as Reagan saw this truth!Up until the AIDS "crisis," Christians had to condemn homosexuality with such amazing Bible verses as ones claiming humans should not bathe and women should hide in a cave during their menstrual cycles (one of my personal favorites). After the AIDS epidemic, however, this disease remained as our bedrock justification against the homosexual agenda for almost two decades--until now. As much as we try to portray ourselves as the all-encompassing, compassionate group of good-doers, the fact remains that we have used diseases, such as AIDS, to remind sinners, such as homosexuals, that they are going to burn in the fiery, Disney-villain-domain-like Hell. It is most important that, as Christians, we remain consistent with our general claims; thus, this is why I now present to you the most recent conclusions of the AIDS virus: ( Read more...Collapse ) (Comment on this) |
Wednesday, April 27th, 2005 | |
_12:07 am_[khizzle] | this community needs to be active again (Comment on this) |
Saturday, March 26th, 2005 | |
_1:38 am_[jesus_thesavior] | A great question!!!!! Hi everyone, I am new here! Here's a cool drill question:When did I die and when did I come back?? (1 Comment |Comment on this) |
Friday, November 19th, 2004 | |
_11:43 pm_[listliss] | 10 points up for grabs. What did the drunk say to Jesus when he dropped the cross? (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
Friday, September 17th, 2004 | |
_1:41 pm_[maydayflower] | Since I'm a proud Christian conservative, I often feel the need to turn people into Christian conservatives just like me. I found this amazingly heart-warming story in my favorite Live Journal community, Bush2004, and I thought I would share it with all of you.A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like somany others her age she considered herself to be a very liberal Democratand was for distribution of all wealth.She felt deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republicanwhich she expressed openly. One day she was challenging her father onhis beliefs and his opposition to higher taxes on the rich & theaddition of more government welfare programs. Based on the lectures thatshe had participated in and the occasional chat with a professor shefelt that for years her father had obviously harbored an evil, evenselfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.The self professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to bethe truth and she indicated so to her father.He stopped her and asked her point blank, how she was doing in school.She answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him knowthat it was tough to maintain. That she studied all the time, never hadtime to go out and party like other people she knew.She didn't even have time for a boyfriend and didn't really have manycollege friends because of spending all her <> timestudying.That she was taking a more difficult curriculum.Her father listened and then asked, "How is your good friend Kwanishadoing?"She replied, "Kwanisha is barely getting by." She continued, "She barely hasa 2.0 GPA," adding, "Kwanisha doesn't have the luxury of having her College Tuition paid for by a rich daddy like I do. Kwanish has to WORK much harder for her education, literally. She works a full-time job and never has time to study. She can barely even afford to pay all her bills on time." She continued "I doubt Kwanisha is going to even pass this semester. She will probably get suspended for having such a poor GPA, and have to continue working her low-wage job in order to pay off the remainder of her tuition."Her father then asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean'soffice and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your 4.0 GPA and give it to yourfriend who only has a 2.0." He continued, "That way you will both have a3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution ofGPA."The daughter visibly shocked by her father's suggestion angrily firedback, "That wouldn't be fair! I got all your money for mine, I didwithout and Mary has worked extremely hard for hers, she worked while I didn't have to work at all!"The father slowly smiled, winked and said, "Welcome to the RepublicanParty"The daughter looked very confused, "Um...okay?"Well, I'll be honest; I like most of this story, but the part about Kwanisha throws me off. Not to mention, I don't like the sound of her name. It sounds deviant.However, I'm glad the overall message of the story is in favor of Republicans like myself.God bless all of your faces. (6 Comments |Comment on this) |
_12:47 pm_[maydayflower] | **Since I'm a proud Christian conservative, I often feel the need to turn people into Christian conservatives just like me. I found this amazingly heart-warming story in my favorite Live Journal community, Bush2004, and I thought I would share it with all of you.**A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like somany others her age she considered herself to be a very liberal Democratand was for distribution of all wealth.She felt deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republicanwhich she expressed openly. One day she was challenging her father onhis beliefs and his opposition to higher taxes on the rich & theaddition of more government welfare programs. Based on the lectures thatshe had participated in and the occasional chat with a professor shefelt that for years her father had obviously harbored an evil, evenselfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.The self professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to bethe truth and she indicated so to her father.He stopped her and asked her point blank, how she was doing in school.She answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him knowthat it was tough to maintain. That she studied all the time, never hadtime to go out and party like other people she knew.She didn't even have time for a boyfriend and didn't really have manycollege friends because of spending all her <> timestudying.That she was taking a more difficult curriculum.Her father listened and then asked, "How is your good friend Kwanishadoing?"She replied, "Kwanisha is barely getting by." She continued, "She barely hasa 2.0 GPA," adding, "Kwanisha doesn't have the luxury of having her College Tuition paid for by a rich daddy like I do. Kwanish has to WORK much harder for her education, literally. She works a full-time job and never has time to study. She can barely even afford to pay all her bills on time." She continued "I doubt Kwanisha is going to even pass this semester. She will probably get suspended for having such a poor GPA, and have to continue working her low-wage job in order to pay off the remainder of her tuition."Her father then asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean'soffice and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your 4.0 GPA and give it to yourfriend who only has a 2.0." He continued, "That way you will both have a3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution ofGPA."The daughter visibly shocked by her father's suggestion angrily firedback, "That wouldn't be fair! I got all your money for mine, I didwithout and Mary has worked extremely hard for hers, she worked while I didn't have to work at all!"The father slowly smiled, winked and said, "Welcome to the RepublicanParty"The daughter looked very confused, "Um...okay?"Well, I'll be honest; I like most of this story, but the part about Kwanisha throws me off. Not to mention, I don't like the sound of her name. It sounds deviant.However, I'm glad the overall message of the story is in favor of Republicans like myself.God bless all of your faces. (Comment on this) |
Monday, September 13th, 2004 | |
_12:43 pm_[maydayflower] | OH heavens, I love new friends, and I have a feeling so do all of you. (Comment on this) |
Sunday, August 29th, 2004 | |
_5:06 pm_[maydayflower] | Love Her Current Mood: faithful (3 Comments |Comment on this) |
Wednesday, August 25th, 2004 | |
_7:34 pm_[maydayflower] | Unacceptable Well I just snorted 10 lines of some sweet-ass Crystal Meth. I’m feeling awfully strange though. Oh well, I guess I’ll just reply this comment http://www.livejournal.com/community/_debate/24188.html?thread=216444#t216444 left me.By the way, don’t be fooled; this person I’m replying IS one of my good, Christian friends.OH, sweet pie, I'm so glad to hear people agree with me on this hot button issue! :) Although, I must say; I'm a little confused with your tone. You seem as if you are arguing with me, while everything you say is something I agree with. :/Nonetheless, let's get started._so you said:"A man is not to lay down with a man. Men need to either lay down alone, or with a girl, okay?" (2:29)What book is that in, what kind of bible do you have, and is that exactly how its wordedin there?cuz ive got this"do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman, this is detestable"_Sorry sweet pie. I knew I didn't have the EXACT quote. I guess I accidently wrote mine too clear on the issue of homosexuality. Either way, it is SO obvious what this line that you point out means. Let me translate: HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SIN. HOMOSEXUALS ARE SINNERS. It just screams it, really. Oh, what was that? I’m not being sarcastic in the slightest - I swear!also the bible does say that women should not exchange natural relations for unnatural ones."...God gave them over to their sinful lust, even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones." Oh my, that's not vague AT ALL. Look there! :points enthusiastically: It says something about "natural." I know what that means! It's kind of like sexual intercourse with men and women being the natural way, but women having sex the unnatural way. Because if it happens in “nature,” it’s natural. Sort of like how we live exactly like animals do in nature. You know, we bath in rivers, defecate in piles of pinecones, and innocently urinate on technology.Wait, women CAN'T possibly defy a "natural" way of sex considering they can't have sex at all! Moreover, women can't penetrate each other at all, making them, according to the definition sin-wise, not gay in any way, shape, or form. That's okay, hon. We'll just pretend; how does that sound? :hugs you:_also in Genesis 2 God created Woman because she was the only suitable helper for him. if a man was fit to be with another man, he would have made two men._You're talking about Adam and Eve, right? I completely agree with you on this all together. After all, I think that whole silly "Dinosaur" myth really needs to be put to rest!_heres some other statistics that show that Gay relationships cant possibley be right:_Oh good, statistics! Those are always completely accurate no matter WHAT! Let's take a look. :eyes grow eager to see more:_-only 2-4% of the population is Gay_Same with Native Americans. Gosh, do you want to tell them they aren't real, or should I?_-duration of Gay marriage is shorter than Straigt marriages._That's very true. And heterosexuals have been able to get married for about 10,000 years more consistently than gay people have! But hey, looking at it from that perspective, I suppose we should also tell black people that they can't vote anymore; because, guess what? Even though we just started letting black people vote, say, about 50 years ago, statistics show they still rarely do that. I think I speak for you when I say "black people obviously don't deserve to vote because after we let them, they still have NOT gotten used to doing it."_-58% of straight marriages last 20 years or more_Wow. heterosexuals have been able to marry for thousands of years, yet half of all married couples are staying married for at least 20 years? That's amazing! But, wait, what's the other half doing.... :/_-5% or Gay marriages last 20 years or longer-15% of gay marriages last 12 years or longer_How redundant that you are mentioning this, sweetheart. THANK YOU!_-most gays dont remain faithful, the average Gay person sleeps with 8 others per year._Wow, gee, that sounds SO scientific. :rolls eyes, but still loves Jesus!: However, I HATE science 'cause, since I'm Christian, it hates me._-66% of "commited" gays say its okay to sleep with others_Really? Did 66% of them tell you that themselves? Quite the detective you are! ;) Can I be honest with ya,' sweet pie? I really hate to tell ya’ this, but statistics like THESE aren’t accurate. Not only is that a proven fact, but it’s also common sense. But I still love God and Jesus, and I hate homosexuals and abortion.:takes more drugs:No one has ever taken a 100% accurate poll or study on sexuality. Moreover, you face TONS of bias with a poll questioning the specific sexuality of people for a number of reasons: (1) With the way people look at homosexuality in our society, many people aren't honest about their TRUE homosexual feelings(2) You can't measure something as ambiguous as sexuality in the first place(3) Did I mention there is TONS of bias in studies involving sexuality?Furthermore, the most accurate and scientific study was done about 50 years ago by Alfred Kinsey, who concluded that 10% of men had experienced AT LEAST some type of homosexual experience in their lives (oh my, I'm not even sure why I know that). That sort of rebuts your questionable statistics, doesn’t it? But I’m sure your statistics are, in fact, reliable. What, did you get those from “Sesame Street Teaches Cause & Effect”? No, just kidding; I bet you got those statistics from the bible because you are such a good Christian, sweet potato._God says that all sins are equal, and that thinking about sinning is the same as doing it._Oh, well you kind of missed the point on this one, Einstein. (oh heavens...)Christians like us try to convince people who have homosexual feelings to repress them and to NOT be open about them. (I guess in your eyes, they are thinking about it, and therefore sinning anyway though, right?)But if that’s NOT lying then what is it? I seriously would LOVE to know, because I must be just so confused as to what that is.Heavens to Betsy! I’m not sure what just came over me, but I’m feeling awfully dizzy from all of that. I’m going to go take a nap, and then pray... then take another nap, then pray some more - A LOT MORE. (1 Comment |Comment on this) |
Monday, August 23rd, 2004 | |
_6:20 pm_[maydayflower] | A lot of people have been wondering why I think the way I do. As a strong Christian follower, I do not feel I have to defend my beleifs, but I will be respectful and explain my stance on such issues as homosexuality.God is a loving, compassionate, and forgiving essense. God will send people to hell if they make a mistake. Mistakes are unacceptable.He made us all as a test to see if we will do what he wants us to do, but then if we make mistakes he sends us to a horrible place for eternity - he does get a little bit of pleasure out of doing this, otherwise he would have logical reason for doing so. Just think about it.God loves all his creations.Homosexuality is a sin (in general terms, because everyone in the world is Christian), I will not argue with you on that. God created homosexual feelings to test us and see if we would act on those deviant feelings. If people do act on their homosexual feelings, then they will be placed in hell after they die.Now your next question may be, "how do you know homosexuality is a sin?"Well, the bible CLEARLY states it: "A man is not to lay down with a man. Men need to either lay down alone, or with a girl, okay?" (2:29)I just don't see how it can be any more clear than this. Even when men kiss other men, that's a sin because kissing and laying are the EXACT same thing; everyone knows that.Alright, so I know what you are thinking now; "Wait a minute... there is nothing in that verse that states a women can't 'lay down' with another women. How can you say God thinks homosexuality is wrong on a general level? Furthermore, if God doesn't like gay women, why didn't he give them a deadly disease as he did gay men (AIDS)?"So what if God doesn't specifically condemn female homosexuality? We can still say he doesn't like it.Whatever - I don't need a bible verse to prove that female homosexuality wrong. It's wrong just 'cause it is - just 'cause it is....Just 'cause it is.In short, God would rather us commit a different sin by lying about our true, sexual feelings than be honest with them.Although Lying is a sin, God likes lying when it is compared to homosexuality. He HAS to, otherwise, why would he want us to not be honest that we are attracted to, and fall in love with people of our same sex? So sometimes God does like sins, okay?I've said it before, and I'll say it again; gay men need to tell straight women that they love them and are attracted to them; as do gay women to men, even if this is not the truth. (10 Comments |Comment on this) |
Wednesday, August 18th, 2004 | |
_11:50 am_[maydayflower] | I'm baaaaack... We're right, and all of you are wrong; what are you goint to do about that?http://www.livejournal.com/community/conservlikewoah/24347.html (5 Comments |Comment on this) |
Sunday, July 11th, 2004 | |
_6:10 pm_[maydayflower] | unacceptable (18 Comments |Comment on this) |
Saturday, June 26th, 2004 | |
_8:16 pm_[incipience_liss] | n00b Oh my God. You people crack me up - I had to join.Drill Time:A woman poured very expensive oil on Jesus' head when he was at Simon's house. What was the name of that costly oil?And an easy one for us Pope followers:Which wounds are included in the Stigmata? Current Mood: amused (10 Comments |Comment on this) |
Wednesday, June 9th, 2004 | |
_10:41 am_[bamlver] | An open invitation! Hey everyone! My name's Blair. A friend of mine, Bry (almostfam0us) started up a Christian community a few weeks ago called vegaschristians. So if you read this, whether or not you live in Las Vegas, we would love to have you join! So stop by and check us out. Current Mood: chipper (5 Comments |Comment on this) |
Tuesday, May 25th, 2004 | |
_10:08 pm_[travoltasunit] | oh hey. s^? (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
Monday, May 3rd, 2004 | |
_8:31 pm_[she_saw_stars] | Who do I have to blow around here to get some heaven points?And does the point distribution depend on the quality/length/drool of the blow?If I literally blow, do I get penalized? (6 Comments |Comment on this) |
Thursday, April 29th, 2004 | |
_7:02 am_[mistyfoxy] | Jehovah 1-- space godThe Church of the SubGenius is the PAN-RELIGION of the FUTURE, and REBELS against the namby-pamby, goody two-shoes "NEW AGE" and "AQUARIAN" ideals of most occult weirdos. Such people are fools, they do not curse, they have no understanding of the need for spiritual violence in this modern space-age a-go-go society.The SubGenius wants no part of the "New Age," it is already here and it obviously sucks. The SubGenius would rather RETRIEVE the manly Past, before 1971 or even 1953, or else dwell in the naughty, fun-loving REMOTE FUTURE, a strange time when anything made of plastic is a valuable antique that collectors will KILL for, when SEXHURT will be recognized and indulged in as sane human nature no matter whether any 'church' or 'government' allows it. But such things are TRIFLES! The SubGenius knows that JEHOVAH 1 is a VENGEFUL GOD OF WRATH! JEHOVAH 1 - a.k.a. YAHWEH - is a mad alien, full of eyes round about, He cometh with the clouds, radioactive, all-pervading, He has forged His covenant with the SubGenius in CHAINS of GENETIC PROGRAMMING and DEMANDS OBEISANCE to His caveman sense of humor. He has been denying us SLACK and what He is making us do dates back to Homo Connectus, First Whole Man; only by letting our bodies obey the Code of financial lust survival that is built into them can our brains be freed from his INEVITABLE FIST.Everything we do, have done, or will ever do, normally on-the-job but also and especially on the causational level of micro-atomic occurences and billionth-of-a-nanosecond electron collisions, is dictated by the permutations of the great SKORE, the cosmic worknet of cause-and-effect, the mutamorphic ARCHIVE of the shapes and movements of every blood tick, sperm whale, vampire gnat, movie star and gorgosaurus, "all the molecules of oil on all the grains of sand of every moonlit beach of the world. " No, "YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE SKORE." But JEHOVAH 1 can...and like an ax this TOTAL FATE PROGRAM confronts our similarly-encoded SENSE OF SLACK and cleaves our heads straight down the middle into schizocephalic right and left sides whose sub-id battleground is responsible for our precariously balanced NENTAL IVES: clones of us in the spirit world whose duplicate lusts influence our behavior on this material plane. Yes - JEHOVAH 1 smote us in primeval days with BAD BRAKES by which we cannot stop our devil twin from overcoming our 'better nature' and by which, furthermore, we cannot even begin to tell the difference between the two! Brakes keep us from committing ANYTHING WE MIGHT IMAGINE IN OUR MOST DANGEROUS FLEETING FANTASIES, such as chopping off noisy children's heads and giving... well, all of us, even non-SubGeniuslike whimps of the second and third waters, are Jekyll/Hyde monsters of two conflicting Noggin Polarities in our personalities; the SHAFT OF SUPPRESSION rears its ugly Head in response to this utter psychosis which squirms for most of our lives only in the dim, unseen reaches of our behavior-pumps; we act completely normal most of the time, but who is to say at any given moment which side, the 'good' or the 'bad,' is currently in control of The Animal? Thank "God" we are usually never aware of the subconscious Armageddon which expresses itself, physically, in our paranoias, human Work Instincts and universanal compulsions, and, spiritually, in our unruly but subtle psychic powers - which result not so much from any 'inner aura' but rather from a somewhat mindless 'ghost' standing invisibly at our sides: it is the half of our intelligence which is currently not controlling The Animal, it is the NENTAL IFE, and it erupts from its usual idiot blithering into weird, occult pheno-manifestations only when our turbulent mental background reaches such peaks of simultaneous crisis and repression as the stormy glandular rampages of adolescence! Current Mood: chipper (6 Comments |Comment on this) |
Sunday, April 11th, 2004 | |
_7:53 pm_[da_ant_87] | Liberty This was the only community under Liberty University as an interest. What does this have to do with Liberty? Current Mood: confused (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
Friday, April 9th, 2004 | |
_6:14 pm_[feedmeagoat] | I have learned a great deal from the bible, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them. a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here? h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die? i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14) I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Current Mood: confused (15 Comments |Comment on this) |
[ << Previous 20 ]