The Rationalizing Voter (original) (raw)
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Political behavior is the result of innumerable unnoticed forces and conscious deliberation is often a rationalization of automatically triggered feelings and thoughts. Citizens are very sensitive to environmental contextual factors such as the title "President" preceding "Obama" in a newspaper headline, upbeat music or patriotic symbols accompanying a campaign ad, or question ...
Political behavior is the result of innumerable unnoticed forces and conscious deliberation is often a rationalization of automatically triggered feelings and thoughts. Citizens are very sensitive to environmental contextual factors such as the title "President" preceding "Obama" in a newspaper headline, upbeat music or patriotic symbols accompanying a campaign ad, or question wording and order in a survey, all of which have their greatest influence when citizens are unaware. This book develops and tests a dual-process theory of political beliefs, attitudes, and behavior, claiming that all thinking, feeling, reasoning, and doing have an automatic component as well as a conscious deliberative component. The authors are especially interested in the impact of automatic feelings on political judgments and evaluations. This research is based on laboratory experiments, which allow the testing of five basic hypotheses: hot cognition, automaticity, affect transfer, affect contagion, and motivated reasoning.
喜欢读"The Rationalizing Voter"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
应该和Zaller的那本the nature and origins of mass opinion 比较阅读；RAS model 的self-sampling听起来真的好有趣啊，而且RAS可以预测正负attitudes，然鹅 本书的JQP model貌似并不能预测~ 想读Zaller那本
1 有用 Qin 2018-03-08 15:00:33
目前讀到第六章，第六章的研究假設和實驗太impressive（儘管有mood effect的問題），整本書挑戰了長期以來政治學deliberative thinking/rationality基礎：3.20更新: 这个理论最后提出neuroscience有助于解决political decision making的问题，不过相当怀疑所谓affect的“物质基础”假设。
0 有用 酷酷功仔 2024-12-03 13:05:41 上海
Regarding the prior attitude effect, people who feel strongly about an issue, even when encouraged to be objective and leave their preferences aside, will evaluate supportive arguments as stronger and... Regarding the prior attitude effect, people who feel strongly about an issue, even when encouraged to be objective and leave their preferences aside, will evaluate supportive arguments as stronger and more compelling than opposing arguments. (展开)
The Rationalizing Voter的书评 · · · · · ·( 全部 1 条 )
lcy 2013-08-11 07:05:21
> 更多书评 1篇