| msg155020 - (view) |
Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) * |
Date: 2012-03-06 15:36 |
| This would be extra nice because I would not have to fill in the entire path manually when I'm setting a b(reak). |
|
|
| msg155220 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *  |
Date: 2012-03-09 09:50 |
| I agree. It should not be too hard to add complete_break() and other similar methods that do this to Pdb. |
|
|
| msg155222 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 10:54 |
| Here's a patch for 3.3, adding completion to most commands (either completes locations, breakpoint numbers or expressions). Please test! |
|
|
| msg155242 - (view) |
Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 16:26 |
| Thanks for the work. I see that completion now works for user-defined variables, but: * completing with 'b' doesn't work at all * completing with 'break' only completes the first directory that gets the TAB key * also, 'break' doesn't complete when I do another try to do auto-completion (works only on first try) |
|
|
| msg155247 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 17:17 |
| > I see that completion now works for user-defined variables, but: > * completing with 'b' doesn't work at all Right, that needs to be added for every shortcut. > * completing with 'break' only completes the first directory that gets the TAB key > * also, 'break' doesn't complete when I do another try to do auto-completion (works only on first try) Indeed. That should be fixed with this new version of the patch. |
|
|
| msg155249 - (view) |
Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 17:36 |
| Works much better, but there are still some issues: * using relative path completes, but I get something like "'../prog.py' not found from sys.path" * using "~/" to try to complete the HOME directory doesn't work... it completes the root directory |
|
|
| msg155250 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 17:41 |
| > * using relative path completes, but I get something like "'../prog.py' not found from sys.path" That has nothing to do with the completion. > * using "~/" to try to complete the HOME directory doesn't work... it completes the root directory Since break doesn't accept "~", I don't see why it should complete it. Keep in mind it's not a shell :) |
|
|
| msg155251 - (view) |
Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 17:46 |
| > Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> added the comment: >> * using relative path completes, but I get something like "'../prog.py' not found from sys.path" > That has nothing to do with the completion. If I give it an absolute path it works, hence the complaint. >> * using "~/" to try to complete the HOME directory doesn't work... it completes the root directory > Since break doesn't accept "~", I don't see why it should complete it. Keep in mind it's not a shell :) Fair enough. Perhaps the completion should not be when encountering that character? |
|
|
| msg155252 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 17:50 |
| >>> * using relative path completes, but I get something like "'../prog.py' not found from sys.path" >> That has nothing to do with the completion. > If I give it an absolute path it works, hence the complaint. But that has to do with how relative paths are handled, not with how they are entered: they are taken relative to sys.path[0]. I don't know why, and if that is the useful thing to do, but it's for another issue. >>> * using "~/" to try to complete the HOME directory doesn't work... it completes the root directory >> Since break doesn't accept "~", I don't see why it should complete it. Keep in mind it's not a shell :) > Fair enough. Perhaps the completion should not be when encountering that character? That should be easy to do, yes. |
|
|
| msg155254 - (view) |
Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 18:14 |
| > But that has to do with how relative paths are handled, not with how they are entered: they are taken relative to sys.path[0]. I don't know why, and if that is the useful thing to do, but it's for another issue. Perhaps refuse to complete all relative paths as well? |
|
|
| msg155255 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2012-03-09 18:16 |
| Nope, don't think so. They are accepted and handled (albeit strangely) after all. |
|
|
| msg155352 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2012-03-10 21:36 |
| New changeset 01a25f638c83 by Georg Brandl in branch 'default': Close #14210: add command argument completion to pdb: complete file names, global/local variables, aliases http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/01a25f638c83 |
|
|