msg167730 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2012-08-08 22:38 |
Serialization of Unicode strings in the pickle module is suboptimal, especially for long strings. Attached patch optimize the serialization thanks to new properties of Unicode strings (PEP 393): * text (protocol 0): avoid any temporary buffer if the string is an ASCII or latin1 string without "\\" or "\n" character; otherwise use a small buffer of 64 KB (instead of two buffer) * binary (protocol 1, 2): avoid any temporary buffer if string is an ASCII string or if the string is already available encoded as UTF-8 The current code for protocol 0 uses raw_unicode_escape() which is really suboptimal: it uses a first buffer to write the escape string, and then a new temporary buffer to store the buffer with the right size (instead of just calling _PyBytes_Resize). |
|
|
msg167731 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2012-08-08 22:41 |
Oh, I forgot to explain that I initially wrote the patch to fix the following failure on our "bigmem" buildbot. http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Ubuntu%20LTS%20bigmem%203.x/builds/165/steps/test/logs/stdio ====================================================================== ERROR: test_huge_str_32b (test.test_pickle.InMemoryPickleTests) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/python-bigmem/3.x.langa-bigmem/build/Lib/test/support.py", line 1281, in wrapper return f(self, maxsize) File "/opt/python-bigmem/3.x.langa-bigmem/build/Lib/test/pickletester.py", line 1267, in test_huge_str_32b pickled = self.dumps(data, protocol=proto) File "/opt/python-bigmem/3.x.langa-bigmem/build/Lib/test/test_pickle.py", line 49, in dumps return pickle.dumps(arg, protocol) MemoryError |
|
|
msg167796 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2012-08-09 17:10 |
Looks interesting. Can you post benchmark numbers? (you can use the pickle tests from http://hg.python.org/benchmarks ) |
|
|
msg167839 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2012-08-09 21:49 |
Here is a benchmark comparing Python 3.3 without and with my patch ned$ python3 perf.py -b fastpickle,pickle_dict,pickle_list,slowpickle ../default/python ../fasterpickle/python Running fastpickle... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle Running pickle_dict... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict Running pickle_list... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list Running slowpickle... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle Report on Linux ned 3.4.4-4.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 5 20:01:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 Total CPU cores: 8 ### fastpickle ### Min: 0.530622 -> 0.332841: 1.59x faster Avg: 0.539450 -> 0.336833: 1.60x faster Significant (t=232.04) Stddev: 0.00552 -> 0.00276: 2.0032x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/dyu3vap' The following not significant results are hidden, use -v to show them: pickle_dict, pickle_list, slowpickle. |
|
|
msg167842 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2012-08-09 22:03 |
For your information, results of benchmark comparing Python 3.2 to 3.3: ned$ python3 perf.py -b fastpickle,pickle_dict,pickle_list,slowpickle ../3.2/python ../default/python Running fastpickle... INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle Running pickle_dict... INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict Running pickle_list... INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list Running slowpickle... INFO:root:Running ../default/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle Report on Linux ned 3.4.4-4.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 5 20:01:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 Total CPU cores: 8 ### fastpickle ### Min: 0.455842 -> 0.542103: 1.19x slower Avg: 0.462334 -> 0.547271: 1.18x slower Significant (t=-101.15) Stddev: 0.00362 -> 0.00471: 1.3028x larger Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/btr644x' ### pickle_dict ### Min: 0.360125 -> 0.345850: 1.04x faster Avg: 0.364019 -> 0.348431: 1.04x faster Significant (t=30.84) Stddev: 0.00308 -> 0.00181: 1.6973x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/cd3ashu' ### pickle_list ### Min: 0.803941 -> 0.584800: 1.37x faster Avg: 0.811115 -> 0.589200: 1.38x faster Significant (t=455.00) Stddev: 0.00261 -> 0.00225: 1.1612x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/8u4m2wf' ### slowpickle ### Min: 0.409008 -> 0.461257: 1.13x slower Avg: 0.413668 -> 0.466201: 1.13x slower Significant (t=-115.31) Stddev: 0.00236 -> 0.00219: 1.0772x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/czrg5kf' |
|
|
msg167847 - (view) |
Author: Alexandre Vassalotti (alexandre.vassalotti) *  |
Date: 2012-08-09 22:08 |
Amazing! Though, it would probably be good idea to benchmarks non-ASCII strings as well. |
|
|
msg167848 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2012-08-09 22:08 |
Last one: Python 3.2 vs patched Python 3.3. ned$ python3 perf.py -b fastpickle,pickle_dict,pickle_list,slowpickle ../3.2/python ../fasterpickle/python Running fastpickle... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle Running pickle_dict... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_dict Running pickle_list... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 --use_cpickle pickle_list Running slowpickle... INFO:root:Running ../fasterpickle/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle INFO:root:Running ../3.2/python performance/bm_pickle.py -n 50 pickle Report on Linux ned 3.4.4-4.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 5 20:01:38 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 Total CPU cores: 8 ### fastpickle ### Min: 0.470211 -> 0.322453: 1.46x faster Avg: 0.475718 -> 0.328496: 1.45x faster Significant (t=205.65) Stddev: 0.00317 -> 0.00395: 1.2456x larger Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/9qpphzp' ### pickle_dict ### Min: 0.353965 -> 0.347959: 1.02x faster Avg: 0.358980 -> 0.350596: 1.02x faster Significant (t=10.44) Stddev: 0.00545 -> 0.00160: 3.3956x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/9pfeqf9' ### pickle_list ### Min: 0.838222 -> 0.593497: 1.41x faster Avg: 0.844636 -> 0.599491: 1.41x faster Significant (t=296.53) Stddev: 0.00520 -> 0.00267: 1.9521x smaller Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/9rynvnv' ### slowpickle ### Min: 0.408205 -> 0.458309: 1.12x slower Avg: 0.413738 -> 0.463916: 1.12x slower Significant (t=-53.85) Stddev: 0.00263 -> 0.00604: 2.3019x larger Timeline: b'http://tinyurl.com/coffkbg' |
|
|
msg178872 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2013-01-03 01:14 |
serhiy: I'm not really motivated to finish the work on this issue (especially "... it would probably be good idea to benchmarks non-ASCII strings as well."). Would you like to work on this? |
|
|
msg178934 - (view) |
Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) *  |
Date: 2013-01-03 11:04 |
Well, I take care of this. I have the own patch for raw_unicode_escape() optimization, but microbenchmarks don't show any speed up. Maybe your approach will be better. |
|
|
msg186115 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2013-04-05 23:27 |
Ping? |
|
|
msg186126 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2013-04-06 14:39 |
Since protocol 0 is essentially dead in Python 3, I would like to propose something simpler and safer: only optimize the binary protocols. If noone beats me to it, I'll adapt Victor's patch for that. |
|
|
msg186139 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2013-04-06 16:48 |
Here is a new patch. Benchmark: ### fastpickle ### Min: 0.631457 -> 0.399104: 1.58x faster Avg: 0.631868 -> 0.399519: 1.58x faster Significant (t=701.85) Stddev: 0.00037 -> 0.00064: 1.7604x larger Timeline: http://tinyurl.com/c6n8h5g |
|
|
msg186218 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2013-04-07 15:41 |
New changeset 09a84091ae96 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #15596: Faster pickling of unicode strings. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/09a84091ae96 |
|
|
msg186219 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *  |
Date: 2013-04-07 15:50 |
I've applied the review comments and committed the patch. Thank you! |
|
|
msg186247 - (view) |
Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) *  |
Date: 2013-04-07 21:34 |
Hi Antoine, I prefer your patch. Great job! 2013/4/7 Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > I've applied the review comments and committed the patch. Thank you! > > ---------- > resolution: -> fixed > stage: patch review -> committed/rejected > status: open -> closed > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue15596> > _______________________________________ |
|
|