| msg58721 - (view) |
Author: Alberto Bertogli (albertito) |
Date: 2007-12-18 02:54 |
| TIPC (http://tipc.sf.net) is an open protocol designed for use in clustered computer environments. It currently has an open source implementation for Linux (>= 2.6.16), and VxWorks. The attached patch (against trunk) adds optional Linux-only support for TIPC in the socket module. If you want me to make one against 3.0 or any other branch, just let me know. Thanks, Alberto |
|
|
| msg58755 - (view) |
Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) *  |
Date: 2007-12-18 19:10 |
| I'm okay with adding this, it doesn't add much code and is properly safeguarded by #ifdefs and has a configure.in patch. I haven't reviewed the code though. |
|
|
| msg58860 - (view) |
Author: Alberto Bertogli (albertito) |
Date: 2007-12-20 05:56 |
| On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:10:39PM -0000, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Guido van Rossum added the comment: > > I'm okay with adding this, it doesn't add much code and is properly > safeguarded by #ifdefs and has a configure.in patch. Thanks! Is there anything else I need to do in order to get this ready for inclusion? Thanks again, Alberto |
|
|
| msg58885 - (view) |
Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * |
Date: 2007-12-20 15:17 |
| Tickle the interest of one of the many folks with commit privileges. Since 2.6 isn't going to be released for months there's no great hurry, but waiting until the last minute would be a mistake. |
|
|
| msg58960 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2007-12-22 10:18 |
| I've chatted with albertito a few days ago and adviced him to post the patch here. I'll take it. From the first review the patch looks good. The code is written cleanly and it uses the appropriate API. The new code is surrounded by ifdefs and it has a patch for configure.in. I'll do the autoreconf to update the other files locally. The patch is missing documentation updates, Misc/NEWS update and some unit tests. The docs should list the new constants and explain TIPC briefly in a few sentences. You don't need to write a novell ;) |
|
|
| msg59336 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-01-05 22:08 |
| *PING* I'm still waiting for a new patch. Your feature patch has been accepted but I won't commit it without doc updates. |
|
|
| msg59378 - (view) |
Author: Alberto Bertogli (albertito) |
Date: 2008-01-06 14:45 |
| On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:08:15PM -0000, Christian Heimes wrote: > I'm still waiting for a new patch. Your feature patch has been accepted > but I won't commit it without doc updates. I know, but holidays were not the best time to write documentation. I'll probably send you the updated patch sometime this week; thanks for the ping =) Thanks, Alberto |
|
|
| msg59439 - (view) |
Author: Alberto Bertogli (albertito) |
Date: 2008-01-07 09:32 |
| On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:45:35PM -0000, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > I'll probably send you the updated patch sometime this week; thanks for > the ping =) Here are the three patches, rebased to the SVN commit 59815. The first one is the same I've already submitted, the second adds the documentation and the third two testcases. The testcases are simple, but I think cover a reasonable amount of TIPC specific code. If you want more, let me know. The documentation is simple, as you told me, just a paragraph explaining about the address format and another explaining the constants. Again, if you want me to change anything, just let me know. Finally, if you want me to rebase this on top of any other branch, you guessed it, just let me know ;) Thanks a lot, Alberto |
|
|
| msg59456 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-01-07 15:37 |
| The unit tests don't work for me (Ubuntu 7.10, Linux 2.6.22, i386) >>> srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_TIPC, socket.SOCK_RDM) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/home/heimes/dev/python/trunk/Lib/socket.py", line 177, in __init__ _sock = _realsocket(family, type, proto) socket.error: [Errno 97] Address family not supported by protocol Do I have to set up my network device for TIPC? |
|
|
| msg59458 - (view) |
Author: Alberto Bertogli (albertito) |
Date: 2008-01-07 16:04 |
| On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:37:54PM -0000, Christian Heimes wrote: > The unit tests don't work for me (Ubuntu 7.10, Linux 2.6.22, i386) > > >>> srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_TIPC, socket.SOCK_RDM) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "/home/heimes/dev/python/trunk/Lib/socket.py", line 177, in __init__ > _sock = _realsocket(family, type, proto) > socket.error: [Errno 97] Address family not supported by protocol > > Do I have to set up my network device for TIPC? No, by default you have a single-node cluster fully capable of TIPC networking. But you do need the TIPC module loaded; have you tried modprobe tipc? If that works, the test cases should pass. I understand that this might be a problem because there is no time to check at runtime if you have TIPC enabled in your kernel (besides the obvious way of trying to create the socket and see if it fails); but you have the same problem with any network protocol (although obviously is much more common to have TIPC disabled than the rest of the supported ones). Do you want me to check for this in the conditional for inclusion? Thanks, Alberto |
|
|
| msg59459 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-01-07 16:19 |
| Committed in r59819 |
|
|