msg63055 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-02-26 22:51 |
hasattr currently returns False when any exception happens in getattr. I see that this tracker I previous patches trying to fix this issue, but they were rejected because they only tried to catch attribute errors. My patch only propagates SystemExit and KeyboardInterrupt exceptions. |
|
|
msg63112 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-02-28 23:18 |
Here's a documentation change that explains hasattr's exception issues top accompany my patch. |
|
|
msg63138 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *  |
Date: 2008-02-29 14:11 |
Please reformat your patch using tabs. |
|
|
msg63147 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-02-29 22:04 |
After looking more closely, I saw that this is documented at http://www.python.org/dev/patches/style/. So the C uses tabs, and the Python uses spaces? |
|
|
msg63151 - (view) |
Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) *  |
Date: 2008-02-29 23:24 |
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Benjamin Peterson added the comment: > > After looking more closely, I saw that this is documented at > http://www.python.org/dev/patches/style/. So the C uses tabs, and the > Python uses spaces? Yes, although that is changing in Python 3.0. |
|
|
msg63341 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-03-06 22:59 |
I suppose another way we could do this is propagate any exception which doesn't inherit Exception. I, however, like just having just those 2 specific exceptions continue. |
|
|
msg63350 - (view) |
Author: Paul Pogonyshev (_doublep) |
Date: 2008-03-07 11:10 |
I think it would be better not to hardcode specific 2 exceptional cases and indeed follow that second way of instanceof(..., Exception). I think it was introduced exactly to separate "things that can be caught by default" from "things that may be caught only in very special cases". I don't find it good Python interpreter not following its own rules. |
|
|
msg63366 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-03-07 21:31 |
Here's a patch for that. Personally, I'm +1 on either option; I just want it fixed. :) I suppose the only (minor) problem with propagate things which are not Exception is libraries where the exceptions don't extend Exception. However, the ability to do this is being removed in Py3k, so it's not huge. |
|
|
msg63367 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-03-07 21:34 |
That last patch is malformed. |
|
|
msg63996 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-03-18 21:48 |
Further comments? |
|
|
msg63999 - (view) |
Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) *  |
Date: 2008-03-18 21:51 |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Further comments? I have not looked at the patch yet (and I don't know when I will get to it). |
|
|
msg66693 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2008-05-12 00:41 |
Done in r63119. |
|
|