Issue 32074: Might be a wrong implementation (original) (raw)

Issue32074

Created on 2017-11-19 09:08 by Sai Bhargava Ramu, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
combinations.py Sai Bhargava Ramu,2017-11-19 09:08
Messages (2)
msg306499 - (view) Author: Sai Bhargava Ramu (Sai Bhargava Ramu) Date: 2017-11-19 09:08
https://docs.python.org/2/library/itertools.html#itertools.combinations #The behaviour of combinations function in documentation is different and I think identation is missing with `else` #I didn't get the logic right is point out anything further. This might not be a real issue
msg306500 - (view) Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * (Python committer) Date: 2017-11-19 09:27
The implementation in the documentation is correct. Did you tested your implementation? The indentation of the "else" is correct. See https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-for-statement
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:54 admin set github: 76255
2017-11-19 09:27:44 serhiy.storchaka set status: open -> closednosy: + serhiy.storchakamessages: + resolution: not a bugstage: resolved
2017-11-19 09:08:49 Sai Bhargava Ramu create