| msg309216 - (view) |
Author: kandhan (kandhan) |
Date: 2017-12-30 05:11 |
| https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/classes.html 9.10. Generator Expressions Some simple generators can be coded succinctly as expressions using a syntax similar to list comprehensions but with "parentheses instead of brackets" Since parentheses comes under brackets, brackets could be changed to "Square Brackets" |
|
|
| msg309218 - (view) |
Author: kandhan (kandhan) |
Date: 2017-12-30 05:15 |
| In the above comment, Line 1 is the URL where it needs improvement Line 2 and 3 are the actual content in the page that needs improvement Line 4 is the proposed solution |
|
|
| msg309221 - (view) |
Author: Steven D'Aprano (steven.daprano) *  |
Date: 2017-12-30 06:31 |
| In British, Australian, New Zealander, and Indian English (and sometimes Canada), at least, "bracket" on its own typically means round brackets () and is rarely if ever used for square brackets [] or curly brackets {} without the adjective. See for example https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/168762/brackets-vs-parenthesis for a discussion. Consequently, the phrase "parentheses instead of brackets" reads to us as "parentheses instead of parentheses" would to Americans. In other words, weird and requiring a moment (or three) of thought to translate. I support the suggested change to "parentheses instead of square brackets" -- it should read more naturally to people in the British Commonwealth and (I hope) shouldn't look too strange to Americans. My personal preference would be for "round brackets instead of square brackets", but I guess that will be a battle I have no hope of winning *wink* |
|
|
| msg309222 - (view) |
Author: kandhan (kandhan) |
Date: 2017-12-30 07:16 |
| "round brackets instead of square brackets" sounds better. Its simple and direct and doesn't require any extra operations other than the required one. |
|
|
| msg309259 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2017-12-30 21:14 |
| "round brackets" would require just as much thought (if not more...it's not a thing at all in American typographical language) for an American to understand as the unadorned bracket does for the rest of you, so the best compromise is "parenthesis instead of square brackets", since parenthesis is used elsewhere in the docs. |
|
|
| msg309355 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 01:34 |
| New changeset f190eb59e60e2ae7a7cbd396458389a7a076e0d3 by R. David Murray (Emily Morehouse) in branch 'master': bpo-32452: clarify term 'brackets' in generator tutorial (#5079) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f190eb59e60e2ae7a7cbd396458389a7a076e0d3 |
|
|
| msg309370 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 13:36 |
| New changeset f24c1857a8a1ba3efb3f957d43371bc9499e3c86 by R. David Murray (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6': bpo-32452: clarify term 'brackets' in generator tutorial (GH-5079) (#5081) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f24c1857a8a1ba3efb3f957d43371bc9499e3c86 |
|
|
| msg309371 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 13:40 |
| It looks like the docs job hung on the 2.7 backport, but I don't see how to restart it. |
|
|
| msg309375 - (view) |
Author: Mariatta (Mariatta) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 15:23 |
| I clicked the "Details" link and restarted the build from there. Closing and reopening the PR will also restart the build. |
|
|
| msg309379 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 15:42 |
| New changeset 0e0d1017a4c8ad6f77ee42d7b640463058037f62 by R. David Murray (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '2.7': bpo-32452: clarify term 'brackets' in generator tutorial (GH-5079) (#5082) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0e0d1017a4c8ad6f77ee42d7b640463058037f62 |
|
|
| msg309380 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2018-01-02 15:52 |
| Thanks, Mariatta. I did click on the details link, so either the restart link isn't obvious or I don't have the correct permissions to do a restart :) And thanks Emily for doing the PR. |
|
|