Issue 32459: Capsule API usage docs are incompatible with module reloading (etc) (original) (raw)
Issue32459
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/76640
classification
Title: | Capsule API usage docs are incompatible with module reloading (etc) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Type: | behavior | Stage: | needs patch |
Components: | Versions: |
process
Status: | open | Resolution: | |
---|---|---|---|
Dependencies: | Superseder: | ||
Assigned To: | Nosy List: | Dormouse759, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan, petr.viktorin | |
Priority: | normal | Keywords: |
Created on 2017-12-31 05:27 by ncoghlan, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin.
Messages (1) | ||
---|---|---|
msg309266 - (view) | Author: Alyssa Coghlan (ncoghlan) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-12-31 05:26 |
After commenting [1] on the fact that the current datetime module C API [2] is problematic due to its reliance on C level global variables, I discovered that this is actually the outcome of our recommended approach to using capsules to export a C API as function pointers: https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#providing-a-c-api-for-an-extension-module So we first need to fix the documentation to propose a reloading friendly way of using capsules in other extension modules, and then we can then propose updating the public datetime C API accordingly (probably by defining new macros that accept the capsule reference as their first argument). [1] https://bugs.python.org/issue10381#msg309214 [2] https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/datetime.html [3] https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#providing-a-c-api-for-an-extension-module |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:58:56 | admin | set | github: 76640 |
2018-01-09 10:25:18 | petr.viktorin | set | nosy: + petr.viktorin, Dormouse759 |
2017-12-31 05:27:01 | ncoghlan | create |